|
|
 |
Six Sigma Opportunity Counting
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted by: Anonymous Posted on: Monday, 16th April 2001, 12:00 AM.
We use PPM to monitor the number of "Defective Parts Per Million" units produced or shipped. In contrast, we could use DPMO as the unit of measure for tracking "Defects Per Million Opportunities". Typically, most products (and services) have more than one opportunity of going wrong. For example, it is estimated than in electronics assembly a diode could have the following opportunities for error: Wrong DIode and Wrong Polarity (inserted backwards), so for each assembly shipped, at least 2 defect opportunities could be assigned for each diode.
Apparently, some manufacturers of large complex equipment with many components prefer to use DPMO because it "compensates" for the number of components (My point is that this approach dilutes Six Sigma metrics).
In our product lines, we average about 50 possible opportunities for error, therefore, the difference in our quality levels (if we use PPM or DPMO) amounts to approximately one sigma depending exclusively on what variable we're tracking. Message Thread:  Return To Discussion ForumPost A New MessageRead the Forum Guide to Good Etiquette
"The Bottom Line" Links
|
 |
|