|
|
 |
I Have 47 CTQ's-Too Many?
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted by: Erik L Posted on: Friday, 12th July 2002, 3:35 PM.
Mike,
If the data is available, I always advocate looking at the data based off a sigma-level basis. This could help identify the largest drain on the overall processes Sigma value. Based off of some of the other information that you've provided I have one more recommendation. Look at the CTQs that came back based off of the reponder. Remember that there are big Cs (ultimate customer) and little Cs (next impacted person/department/etc). Stratify the CTQs based on this and then rank their relative importance. Pick a representative sample of cutomers from each group and look to associate scores of importance (multi-voting and/or Pugh matrix could help here). You could then list your process steps and then create a Prioritization Matrix of the process to VOC. I have a template that could help with this if you desire. You could then look at a Venn-diagram type analysis. Is there overlap between the process steps highlighted as most important, or are they largely independent of each other? Remember, it's all about establishing the Y=f(x). We need to know what inputs are driving the outputs from our process/service. Keep driving for the x's.
Regards,
Erik Message Thread:  Return To Discussion ForumPost A New MessageRead the Forum Guide to Good Etiquette
"The Bottom Line" Links
|
 |
|