|
|
 |
Maximize Six Sigma Team Performance
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I would like to know if anyone has had experience or heard any details regarding Six Sigma Quality in Japan. We are developing a Quality organization for a Japanese company with a blend of foreign and Japanese staff. We would like to take a look at experiences that other Quality leaders may have had in Japan." Japanese Six Sigma Teams
|
|
|
|
By Kim NilesThe Black Belt's ability to maximize team members' contributions is critical to the success of the Six Sigma project. Many factors must be addressed. Assuring Basic Team Member Needs During World War II Abraham Maslow (1908-1970) developed his famous hierarchy of needs study. He showed an individual needs hierarchy ranging from the most basic, to social, then esteem needs that he concluded needed to be met before a person can reach self actualization (all that one can become). Applying Maslow's hierarchy of needs to Six Sigma allows us to develop a prioritized list of needs necessary to address in order to optimize individual and team performance. The following list is the author's derivation for how Maslow's hierarchy of needs applies to Six Sigma team performance: Physiological, Security, and Social Needs: To feel ones pay is an appropriate exchange for efforts renderedA general feeling of acceptanceTo be allowed social interaction with others in the workplaceTo possess good health and be well restedTo be able to work in a safe working environmentEsteem Needs: To feel part of related programs, projects, or teamsTo be recognized by managementTo be given proper job related training or thorough directionTo be empowered to make decisions regarding ones workTo be given roles, job duties, a title, and or some authority over ones workTo be given goals, objectives, and or mutually well-understood expectationsTo be given access to needed informationTo be given resources as neededSelf-Actualization Needs: To be given a challengeTo be given slack time to foster innate creativityTo be trained in tools and techniques that promote the application of thought, skills, education, and experienceTo be uniquely experienced or appropriately skilled in adaptive learning techniquesTeam Level Effectiveness Measurements Team level personnel performance metrics should be established to reflect corporate or higher-level objectives and be coupled with cause-and-effect control factors that affect desired end results. Kaplan outlines three such core employee measurements as follows: Employee Satisfaction: Involvement in team decisionsRecognition for contributionsAccess to sufficient information needed to help the teamEncouragement to be creative and intuitiveAmount of support received from other staffOverall company satisfactionEmployee Retention: Percentage of staff turnover (both permanent and requested moves to other teams)Employee Performance: Skills match for team needsMoraleInnovation and creativity appliedThe type of process being improved (internal or external)The value of the need (affect on profit and or customer satisfaction)Aggregate team member measurements should be in the form of revenue per employee or per project. These figures should include the return after employee compensation or the ratio of output produced to employee compensation. Member Level Effectiveness Measurements Member level effectiveness metrics can be important to address yet are often out of the scope of what the Black Belt needs to address in maintaining and or optimizing team performance. Jack Welch (Past GE CEO) outlines potential-and-performance metrics that separate employees into categories of A (top 20%), B (middle 70%), and C (bottom 10%) type employees. He uses a normal distribution curve to show how the B employees are the "vital 70%" that need to receive the most support. He warns that without comprehensive metrics, some employees will appear to fit into category A yet really be category C employees. Jack Welch also points out how variation is our enemy when it comes to process variation yet our friend when it comes to developing a work force. He distinguishes between the different types of people based on what he calls the four E's and one P. They are: Energy levelAbility to Energize others around common goals (opposing Enervation with C employees)Possess the Edge to make yes-and-no decisionsAble to Execute and deliver on promisesHaving Passion in their workTeam Member Rewards All human based objectives should be coupled to rewards of some sort. Gain sharing is one common method of distributing rewards to all team members when the team achieves a common goal. When using gain sharing, Kaplan suggests that management should measure high level gain sharing activity such as via the percentage of all projects with gain sharing, the percentage of projects in which potential gains were achieved, and the percent of individual team incentives linked to project success. Conclusion The Black Belt's skills in maintaining and assisting team members toward self-actualization, and in monitoring and addressing key individual performance factors is critical to overall team success. With a well-maintained team comes team synergy, which results in happier, healthier, and more productive employees. References
Kaplan, Robert and Norton, David. "The Balanced Scorecard". Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts. 1996.Welch, Jack and Byrne, John. "Jack: Straight from the Gut". Warner Books, Inc. New York, NY. 2001.Wortman, Bill. "The Quality Engineer Primer". Quality Council of Indiana. West Terre Haute, IN. 1997. 5th Edition. pp. X-5.
Copyright © 2000-2008 iSixSigma LLC All Rights Reserved Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited Copyright Requests
Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study? Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers. It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.
"The Bottom Line" Links
|
|
|
|
BMG
Upgrade Your Skills
|
Master Black Belt Certification
Get the industry's most Flexible, Robust Program for Professionals
>> Find out more
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
SIGMAPRO |
MBB, Lean Sigma, & DFSS
when
experience
matters
most...
|
|
![]() |
M O T O R O L A U N I V E R S I T Y |
Learn from the most experienced practitioners of Six Sigma in the world
Public Training & Certification
Click here to take a free Six Sigma Lesson
|
|
![]() |
|
J |
URΛN
| |
Lean Six Sigma Public Workshops
Atlanta, GA - Sept 2008
Become one of your organization's 'vital few'. Get Juran Certified. |
|
|
![]() |
|
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Now offering Process Simulation !
4 weeks + 1 cost saving project + 1 mentor + 1 caring instructor = 1 Marketable Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
|
|
![]() |
|
WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY
Now offering Process Simulation !
4 weeks + 1 cost saving project + 1 mentor + 1 caring instructor = 1 Marketable Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
|
|
![]() |
THE UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS
AT AUSTIN |
|
2 weeks + 1 project = Black Belt Certification
|
|
|
![]() |
| . |
Find us on LinkedIn |
Join the iSixSigma Network and Connect with Other Six Sigma Pros |
|
| . |
|
Download the iSixSigma Toolbar for 1-Click access. Search Your Way. Everyday. Without Delay.

|
 |
|