Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
BMGI Webinar Series Air Academy Six Sigma Certifications from Villanova University Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Tools & Templates  > Design Of Experiments (DOE) Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
2008 Version! DMAIC Training Slides: 1,176 Slides + Instructor Notes and More for $99.99
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  Summit & Awards
  Most Successful Start-up
  Breakthrough Projects
  Speaker Proposals
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
   DOE
   FMEA
   Glossary
   Histogram
   Pareto
   Poka Yoke
   SIPOC
   Software
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Reducing Variability With DOE
A Case Study On Propagation of Error (POE)

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "I had a guy come to me the other day desperately wanting to have a DOE done on his sonic welder. The problem is with scrap: he says the line has 2.5% scrap caused by sonic burns. My question is: What can I measure to eliminate the burn but still get a good sonic weld?"

    Selecting A Measure For A DOE
    By M
    New from iSixSigmaReducing Help Desk Turnaround Time Project Example

    DMAIC Best-Sellers Project Examples

    Time Study Worksheet
    ark J. Anderson and Patrick J. Whitcomb

    Page 1 > Minimizing Propagation of Error (POE) from Varying Inputs

    Page 2 > A Case Study On POE

    References
    1. Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P.J., "Design Experiments that Combine Mixture Components with Process Factors," Paint and Coatings Industry, November 2000.

    2. Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P.J., "Computer-Aided Tools for Optimal Mixture Design," Paint and Coatings Industry, November 1999.

    3. "Making Six Sigma Benefits Stick," Chemical Week Vol. 163, No. 19. p. 40, 5/9/2001.

    4. Adsit., D. "Six Sigma's Intangibles," Spring 1999 Leadership Report, Rath and Strong.

    5. WR Medical Electronics Company, 123 N. 2nd St., Stillwater, MN 55082.

    6. Helseth, et al, Design-Expert, Version 6 for Windows, Stat-Ease, Inc, Minneapolis, 2001 ($995).

    7. Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P.J., "Optimization of Paint Formulations Made Easy with Computer-Aided Design of Experiments for Mixtures," Journal of Coatings Technology, Volume 68, Number 858, July 1996, pages 71-75.

    Appendix: Data For Powder-Coating Study

    Comb.

    A: Epoxy

    B: Ca

    C: Ti

    D: Bake

    temp

    E: Bake

    time

    Adhesion

    Hardness

     

    wt %

    wt %

    wt %

    deg F

    min

     

     

    1

    40

    20

    30

    360

    25

    112.1

    115

    2

    35

    30

    25

    360

    25

    116.4

    103

    3

    38.3

    23.3

    28.3

    360

    25

    156.0

    72

    4

    45

    20

    25

    360

    25

    245.0

    167

    5

    35

    20

    35

    320

    15

    169.0

    140

    6

    45

    20

    25

    320

    15

    174.8

    19

    7

    35

    30

    25

    320

    15

    126.8

    130

    8

    35

    20

    35

    320

    35

    87.2

    57

    9

    45

    20

    25

    400

    15

    339.3

    294

    10

    35

    30

    25

    400

    35

    146.6

    119

    11

    35

    20

    35

    400

    15

    213.0

    143

    12

    45

    20

    25

    320

    35

    327.0

    142

    13

    35

    30

    25

    400

    15

    102.2

    52

    14

    35

    20

    35

    400

    35

    146.1

    153

    15

    45

    20

    25

    400

    35

    356.9

    241

    16

    35

    30

    25

    320

    35

    144.2

    123

    17

    35

    20

    35

    320

    25

    152.9

    92

    18

    35

    20

    35

    360

    30

    195.7

    127

    19

    45

    20

    25

    360

    35

    392.5

    226

    20

    35

    25

    30

    320

    15

    164.6

    102

    21

    40

    25

    25

    320

    15

    101.0,  75.2

    11,   17

    22

    40

    20

    30

    320

    15

    106.9

    19

    23

    35

    25

    30

    320

    35

    183.9

    109

    24

    40

    25

    25

    320

    35

    149.7, 139.7

    89,   78

    25

    40

    20

    30

    400

    15

    208.7

    163

    26

    35

    25