Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Tools & Templates  > Design Of Experiments (DOE) Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
DMAIC 2009 Training Slides: 1,220 PPT Slides + Instructor Notes and More for $99.95
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  2010 Summit & Awards
  2010 Energy Forum
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
   DOE
   FMEA
   Glossary
   Histogram
   Pareto
   Poka Yoke
   SIPOC
   Software
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Three Romeos And A Juliet
An Early Brush With Design Of Experiments

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Six Sigma Quick Poll
    What is your familiarity level with Design of Experiments (DOE)?
    Very familiar
    Familiar
    Vague familiarity
    Heard of it, but never done a DOE
    Discussion Forum
    "Can someone please tell me if there is a way to do a DOE when the only response data you can get is attribute (pass/fail)? The process is hermetically sealed laser weld. We would like to find the optimum settings for the weld schedule (setpoints and parameters)."

    DOE With Attribute Response Data
    Download Products

    By Ravindra Khare

    Peeping into my youthful past, I recall three close friends: Naren, Deepak and me walking to college together every day. I vividly remember one bright sunny morning as we pass a large house with neatly manicured gardens. A young girl rushes out into the greens and abruptly pauses at the sight of three young men passing her gate. Wow! We think she is a vision to behold, fresh as the dew that basks in the early sun and pretty as a rose bud. We freeze in our paths.

    Congratulating ourselves on our discovery, we make it a point to pass Renu's house at that precise hour every day (Naren's fantastic information network has already discovered her name.) Sure enough, she is there day after day. We float by in a trance, weak kneed, ogling at her, and excitedly discuss her after our class.

    One day it finally happens. Renu gives us a dazzling smile and winks at us. The three Romeos are floored and stupefied. This can't be true. Did we imagine it? It was too far fetched for all three of us to have imagined the same thing. Our hearts turn a summersault. Eager for more, we pause expectantly by her house the next day and lo, there comes the smile and the wink. We are now positively starry eyed, and almost dance our way to college.

    Strangely, Deepak looks rather thoughtful. "Come on man, let's celebrate! She did it again" I try to cheer him into the general loony mood. "Really?", he retorts, "But there is a little catch. Who did she wink at? You, me or Naren?" I wake up with a start. Now, this is serious. I too wear his brooding cap. Naren looks up and joins the gloom. "Certainly, she couldn't be winking at all three of us?" We don't bother to reply.

    The smile and the wink fail to cheer us the next day. "Let's ask her up front" I put in my two cents. They seem to agree, but the question of who will win her attention still remains. We must find out which one of us Renu fancies. Thinking hard, slowly but surely a game plan evolves. We decide to find out through planned experimentation. Instead of all three of us walking together, we decide to go past her house in a well-planned pattern of twos and singles. We quickly put our plan into action. We already know Renu's response to all three of us walking together and tabulate it as below:

    The next day, I stay back. Deepak and Naren walk together past her house. Much to my dismay, the smile and wink greet them enthusiastically. We tabulate this result as:

    It's now Naren's turn to stay back. Deepak and I dutifully get the smile and wink. Prompt in our paperwork, we put down these results too.

    The data is building up, and we are all set to jump to wishful conclusions. We tell Deepak that she's just playing games, and keep him back at home. Naren and I take a confident walk, eager to prove our theory of Renu playing games, but are in for a shock. Renu simply does not make an appearance. Less sure about ourselves, we tabulate this result too.

    Deepak gives the laugh that love struck boys usually give, and suggests that we now walk one person at a time. Naren and I do our part and encounter Renu's vanishing trick. Results are dutifully tabulated.

    Deepak is on cloud nine by now. He puts on his best shirt, shines his shoes, and walks past Renu's house, chin up. He actually walks up and down a couple of times, but Renu still fails to appear. Naren and I take pleasure in tabulating this result.

    Deepak by now looks like a deflated balloon, and Naren and I are frankly perplexed. "What's the meaning of this? Is she trying to twist us around her little finger?" Deepak is rightly antagonized. "Look, rather than jumping to conclusions, let's run this combination of experiments again. At the end of all the runs, we can analyze the data and form some hypothesis." My statistics classes have started showing their effect. My friends agree to the suggestion.

    "I am not going on a Friday" Naren states with a sudden urge to cling to superstitions. The order in which the runs are carried out is decided by rolling a pair of dice and the matter is settled. Over the next week, we carry out the experiment again and the results are put together. We are now ready for the judgment. We consolidate the results from both the sets of runs as follows:

    We decide to analyze the results by the change in Renu's response to the presence or absence of each of the Casanovas. Results (I discovered later that they are called Effect Plots in the Design of Experiments (DOE) parlance) showed as follows.

    Obviously, Deepak is the clear winner. Naren and I shake Deepak's hand, wish him good luck and go on to chase the other damsels in the neighborhood. Not until much later, when I studied statistics and Design of Experiments, did I realize that we had performed a Factorial Experiment as we pursued Renu.

    There were three Factors in this experiment: Naren, Ravi and Deepak. A factor is an independent variable in an experiment whose state can be varied. In a planned experiment, the factors are deliberately varied in a predetermined manner. The response is measured at every run of each combination. In a scientific experiment, pressure and temperature of the reaction could be two of the factors. These are varied across the experimental pattern and the response characteristic (e.g., yield of the reaction) is measured.

    Each factor was evaluated at two Levels: the person was Present or Absent. A level is a state of the factor that is deliberately varied. Experimentation is typically done at two, or occasionally three levels for every factor. Combining all factors and their levels can become too large and daunting a task if every factor is changed one at a time. An efficient experimental design that varies multiple factors at the same time can reduce the number of runs to a great extent, still providing enough information for confident results. Levels can be discrete like the Present / Absent levels that our experiment had, or can be numeric, such as 80 degrees / 100 degrees centigrade for the temperature factor in a chemical reaction.

    The objective variable that is calculated is the Response, which measures:

    1. The relationship between the change in level of each of the factors and the change in response.

    2. The change in response for a change in each factor level (sensitivity)
    In our experiment, the Response was attribute data expressed as whether Renu winked or not. We could gage the size of the response by counting favorable responses to each factor at each level. The Response can also be variable data, such as a change in purity from 90% to 95%, where the numerical value of the response is averaged for each level. The difference in response is called the Effect, and is expressed using an Effects Plot as shown above.

    The experiment we conducted was Balanced since each factor at each level was evaluated at an equal number of other factor-level combinations. A balanced experiment gives the same evaluation advantage to each factor and helps remove bias that may appear as a result of an unequal amount of data for each factor-level combination.

    Randomization was achieved by rolling the dice to determine the sequence of runs. This is important since it gives all external factors an equal chance to affect every run of the experiment. A non-randomized experiment stands a great risk of external factors acting in a systematic manner, adding noise to the response.

    Conducting two sets of experimental runs led to Replication, providing more data and greater confidence in evaluating the results. One drawback to conducting more replications is the potential for added costs in the experimentation process.

    What then went wrong in run 7 and run 14? Why didn't Renu respond to Deepak's presence?

    In the first case (run 7), it was a Lurking Variable that played a role. Renu happened to have a father who was built like a Gorilla and had a very foul temper. On the day Deepak went alone in the first Replication, the father had confined Renu to her room for some trivial reason. A lurking variable like Renu's father is an external factor that strikes suddenly and randomly to affect the response and confuse the results. In the second case (run 14), it was Renu herself who was in a foul mood and refused to perform as expected. After all she was human, and couldn't be expected to fall in line with statistics all the time. This represents an Experimental Error commonly encountered in experimentation.

    I was lucky to learn structured Design of Experiments early in life!

    In case you're wondering what happened to the three Romeos...

    Deepak married Renu, and went ahead to become a software professional. Deepak and Renu live in Boston.

    Naren is a research scientist with a world-class pharmaceutical company in Philadelphia. Early training in Experimental Design undoubtedly prepared him for a great scientific career.

    Ravi is the Managing Director of Symphony Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Please give him your feedback on this narration.

    About The Author
    Ravindra Khare is a Founder and Director of Symphony Technologies (www.symphonytech.com). He is a qualified Mechanical and Industrial Engineer and a keen student of Quality & Productivity Technology for the past 18 years. He can be contacted at ravi@symphonytech.com.

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 4.57
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright � 2000-2009 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.




    "The Bottom Line" Links

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Six Sigma Black Belt (DMAIC) Training Slides - 2009 Version!
      The 2009 Six Sigma Black Belt course includes over 40 more slides than the 2008 version. Contents include: 1,220 PowerPo...
    2. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    3. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    4. Kaizen Workshop E-book
      This 150+ page ebook teaches key tools and techniques of Kaizen, as well as real application to enhance learning. Kaizen...
    5. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt E-book
      In 670 pages learn everything within the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC body of knowledge to successfully achieve Black Belt certi...
    6. Process Management Training Slides
      The 2008 Process Management course is designed in two phases comprised of:352 Powerpoint slidesInstructor notesSlide exp...
    7. Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) E-Book or Print
      Need an "encyclopedia" consisting of many of the tools you’ll study? Need a helpful refresher to apply the DFSS process?...
     
    Six Sigma AdLinks
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. �2000-2009 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 0.2
    About iSixSigmaContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map