Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Tools & Templates  > Design Of Experiments (DOE) Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
DMAIC 2009 Training Slides: 1,220 PPT Slides + Instructor Notes and More for $99.95
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  2010 Summit & Awards
  2010 Energy Forum
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
   DOE
   FMEA
   Glossary
   Histogram
   Pareto
   Poka Yoke
   SIPOC
   Software
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Using DOE to Solve a Product Development Problem
An iSixSigma Case Study

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "...how does a DOE team know it is including all the necessary factors and responses? ...critical factors could be missed or the incorrect response selected...I realize...process experts use experience and knowledge, but is guesswork involved too?"

    Contribute to this Discussion
    Download Products

    By Maria di Nucci and Paolo Mancuso

    Design of experiments (DOE) is a useful tool for determining specific factors affecting defect levels in a product. A major automotive company learned just how valuable this tool is when it conducted a study of defects occurring in its alternator product. DOE was applied to identify the cause of ventilation noise within the alternator, a problem that led to customers rejecting the product.

    The DOE Approach

    The first step in applying the DOE principles involves identifying all possible factors considered independent variables. The alternator team identified four:

    • Rotor balancing
    • Claw pole
    • Bracket
    • Stator configuration

    In order to understand the contribution of the individual factors to the noise problem, the team applied a screening design, 23 and then a factorial design 24. This was done to eliminate some factors and add others and to minimize the number of necessary noise tests.

    During the screening design, the stator configuration was deemed as fixed, reacting the same in each experiment. The stator configuration was chosen for testing based on an analysis of historical data, where the shape of the stator had a great impact on the noise level of the alternator. The experiments were carried out by varying the stator once all other factors were discarded. Each factor was characterized by two levels:

    • Rotor balancing: High (H) or Low (L)
    • Claw pole: chamfered (C) or normal production (NP)
    • Bracket: automotive firm P or automotive firm F

    Rotor balancing influences ventilation noise through the rpm regime. The claw pole chamfered is the most important factor for the product development. In fact, the shape of the claw pole has a great impact on the production cost. Thus, for the firm, it is valuable to measure the noise impact of this product before changing the product characteristics and consequently the production process. The last factor is represented by the bracket.

    Order

    Block

    Claw Pole

    Rotor Bal.

    Bracket

    1

    1

    NP

    L

    P

    2

    1

    C

    H

    P

    3

    1

    C

    L

    F

    4

    1

    NP

    H

    F

    5

    2

    C

    L

    P

    6

    2

    NP

    H

    P

    7

    2

    NP

    L

    F

    8

    2

    C

    H

    F

    Conducting a DOE Analysis

    At this point in the DOE analysis, the team built a statistical table comparing the combination of low and high levels for each factor. Eight runs were created in the screening design as shown in the table on the left. The team was unable to completely randomize the runs due to the experimental environment, which resided in a semi-anechoic laboratory with a high amount of mounting gig. Two types of gigs were employed with two alternative brackets. Consequently the test was conducted with a factorial design consisting of two blocks, reducing the number of mounting gigs changes.

    The tests were carried out following the International Standard ISO 3745-1977 for determination of sound power levels associated with noise sources. The ISO procedure specifies two laboratory methods for determining the sound power radiated by a device, machine, component or subassembly employing a laboratory anechoic room. The methods are particularly robust for rating the sound output of sources which produce steady noise and for which directivity information on the source can be collected. During the DOE analysis, the team measured the effects of the factors using the area (A) under the noise curve (Figure 1) as a response factor.

     Figure 1: The Noise Curve

    The noise curve describes the relationship between the sound pressure, dbA, and the rpm. The critical range is between 6,000 and 8,000 rpm. If the noise ventilation problem occurs in this range customers can refuse the product. The area under the noise curve for each test for the 23 factorial design is shown in the table below.

     

     Order

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

     Area (rpm x dbA)

    42390

    36284

    35373

    40084

    37108

    42123

    40215

    35353

    During the screening design a single-replication strategy was used to determine the factor levels. With only one replication there is no internal estimate of error. Therefore, the team concluded that certain high-order interactions were negligible and consequently combined the mean square to estimate the error. An examination of the normal probability plot for the estimates of the effects revealed that they were normally distributed with a mean of zero and a variance of sigma squared (Figure 2).

     Figure 2: Normal Probability Plot of the Effects

    Since all the effects that lie along the line are negligible, consideration is given to the main effects of the claw pole (A) and the bracket (C). Both these effects are negative requiring a run of both factors at the high level in order to achieve the maximum reduction of ventilation noise. The interaction plot for the factors shows that there are no interaction effects (Figure 3).

     Figure 3: Interaction Plot (Date Means) for Area

    Combination

    I

    A

    B

    AB

    C

    AC

    BC

    ABC

    (1)

    +

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    +

    -

    a

    +

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    +

    b

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    ab

    +

    +

    +

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    c

    +

    -

    -

    +

    +

    -

    -

    +

    ac

    +

    +

    -

    -

    +

    +

    -

    -

    ab

    +

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    abc

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    Since the rotor balancing (B) is not a significant
    factor and all interactions involving the rotor
    balancing are negligible, it was discarded from
    the experiment, which then became a 22 factorial
    design in A and C with two replicates. The table 
    at the left shows contrast constants for the 23
    design by factorial effects. These results are
    confirmed by the analysis of variance for the data
    using a simplified interaction model. The first of 
    the two tables below shows estimated effects and
    coefficients for area (coded units). The second
    table below is an analysis of variance for area
    (coded units).


     Term

    Effect

    Coeff.

    Se Coeff.

    P

     Constant

     

     38616

     109.5

     0.000

     Claw Pole

     -5173 

     -2587

     109.5

     0.000

     Bracket

     -1720

     -860

     109.5

     0.001

     Claw Pole * Bracket

     387

     193

     109.5

     0.152









     Source

    Df

    Seq SS

    Adj SS

    Adj MS

    F

    P

     Main Effects

    2

     59447004

     59447004

     29723502

     309.69

     0.009

     2-wai Interactions

    1

     299538

     299538

     299538

     3.12

     0.152




          


    Results of the DOE to this point confirmed the hypothesis of the normal probability plot of residuals (Figure 4).

     Figure 4: Normal Probability Plot of the Residuals

    The points on the plot lie reasonably close to a straight line, lending support to the team's conclusion that both the claw pole and the bracket are the only statistically significant effects and that the underlying theoretical assumptions of the analysis are satisfied.

    Conclusion: Reduction in Customer Rejections

    The resolution of the problem represented an important goal for the future production strategy of the automotive firm. Application of the DOE methodology suggested that a great improvement of the product is achievable through a better shape of the claw pole as well as the bracket. As a result, the firm can expect to reduce the incidence of customer rejection of its alternator product.

    About the Authors

    Maria di Nucci is a scholarship holder at the faculty of engineering in the University of Rome "Tor Vergata." Her experience includes design of experiments and its application to the automotive industry. She can be reached at mariadinucci@libero.it.

    Paolo Mancuso is an associated professor of economics and statistics at the faculty of engineering in the University of Rome "Tor Vergata." His experience includes the forecasting techniques and quality measurements. He can be reached at mancuso@disp.uniroma2.it.

     

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 4.14
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright � 2000-2009 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.




    "The Bottom Line" Links

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Six Sigma Black Belt (DMAIC) Training Slides - 2009 Version!
      The 2009 Six Sigma Black Belt course includes over 40 more slides than the 2008 version. Contents include: 1,220 PowerPo...
    2. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    3. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    4. Kaizen Workshop E-book
      This 150+ page ebook teaches key tools and techniques of Kaizen, as well as real application to enhance learning. Kaizen...
    5. Process Management Training Slides
      The 2008 Process Management course is designed in two phases comprised of:352 Powerpoint slidesInstructor notesSlide exp...
    6. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt E-book
      In 670 pages learn everything within the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC body of knowledge to successfully achieve Black Belt certi...
    7. Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) E-Book or Print
      Need an "encyclopedia" consisting of many of the tools you’ll study? Need a helpful refresher to apply the DFSS process?...
     
    Six Sigma AdLinks
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. �2000-2009 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 0.2
    About iSixSigmaContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map