Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
BMGI Webinar Series Air Academy Six Sigma Certifications from Villanova University Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Statistics  > Data / Sampling / Descriptive Statistics Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
2008 Version! DMAIC Training Slides: 1,176 Slides + Instructor Notes and More for $99.99
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  Denver Live!
  Summit & Awards
  Most Successful Start-up
  Breakthrough Projects
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
   Normality
   Variation
  Tools & Templates
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Achieving Customer Delight Via VOC and Data Analysis

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "I am currently working on a project to help in defining metrics for a customer response center....Can anyone suggest a...methodology where in we can track the metrics... (with) 5% as the normal defect rate and thus resulting to 6 sigma performance?"

    Contribute to this Discussion

    B
    Download Products
    y Nandan Ramaswamy

    In an inbound contact center environment, delivery of customer service and the end-customer satisfaction index cannot be always accurately determined by service level metrics. A customer service center may be performing at consistent service levels, but the end-customer retention rate and the overall customer satisfaction index may be relatively low.

    Direct measurement of customers' perceptions using questionnaires or focus groups is much more telling than service level metrics. An effective customer questionnaire can help a Six Sigma project team obtain the information on the performance of the center which is often lost in service level metrics, namely whether the center is useful to the customer. Armed with this vital information, a Six Sigma project team will be able to make enhancements to service that are visible and relevant to the customer experience.

    Some specific details that can be included in the questionnaire are:

    • Overall experience with customer service received
    • Type of product or service used
    • Features of product or service liked/disliked
    • Impact of tangibles (customer service skills, information received, rapport built)
    • Type of customer concern
    • Number of calls made to resolve the concern
    • Reason for multiple calls made
    • Follow-up action taken

    (Care should be taken to obtain responses specific to the center, especially if there are multiple vendors for the same product or service.)

    Trend analysis can be conducted on quantitative question types like multiple choices, rank order or a simple Likert scale where customer satisfaction attributes are assigned to numbers. The rank order and Likert scale surveys enable segmentation of results into satisfaction-level buckets.

    Example of a rank order survey:

    Question: In thinking about your most recent experience with [name of company], was the quality of customer service you received:

    Response: ___ Very Poor   ___ Somewhat Unsatisfactory  ___ About Average ___ Very Satisfactory  ___ Superior

    Example of a Likert scale survey:

    On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Somewhat Disagree, 3 = Neither Agree Nor Disagree, 4 = Somewhat Agree and 5 = Strongly Agree. Please circle one number for each statement

    Question: In thinking about my most recent experience with [name of company], the quality of customer service received has been excellent.

    Response: 1  2  3  4  5

    The questionnaire is administered to a focus group of end-customers and the entire population data is considered for analysis. This exercise should be repeated regularly. Care also must be taken to ensure that the sampling protocol is appropriate for the customer population.
     
    At this stage, a trend analysis can be extremely valuable as an early warning indicator of potential problems and issues with customer satisfaction and changes in service standards that impact customers. The standard deviation and variance can be measured with this tool. A dip in the "mean" for a satisfaction question in a particular month should trigger an immediate investigation of the cause. It also can be used to gauge response rates over time, e.g., weekly, monthly and yearly.

    Data Analysis and Process Improvement

    The process of improving the quality of calls handled by a typical inbound contact center requires a rigorous implementation of the DMAIC methodology.

    A high-level process map identifies the areas of improvement, key deliverables and the people involved in the supplier-process-customer chain.

    C

    O

    P

    I

    S

    Customer

    Output

    Process

    Input

    Supplier


    Client



    End-Customers



    Management



    Training Dept.


    Customer Care
    Executives


    + Delivery of product
        Knowledge
    + Customer service
    skills
    + Communication skills


    + Understanding of the
       problem
    + Comprehensibility
    + One-time resolution
    + Listening skills
    + SLA
    + Minimum rework
    + Multi-skilled workforce
    + Listening skills
    + English usage
    + Accent
    + One-time resolution

    + Improve quality of inbound
       calls


    + Evaluations after training
        on product knowledge and
        customer service skills
    + Standardization of
        knowledge management
        system and regular
        updating
    + Quality evaluations and
       feedback
    + Regular monitoring of low
        performers
    + Correction action and
       refresher training if
       necessary



    + Product training
    + Core training

     




    + Product knowledge
    + English usage
    + Accent
    + Access to KMS




    + Quality evaluations
    + Monitoring and
       training



    Training
    Department



    Customer Care
    Executives

     



    QA
    Department

    The baseline of the process should clearly state the present performance level in terms of a process sigma score, and the target below which any performance will be considered as defective. The measurement tool used to evaluate the performance is of paramount importance. This measurement system should be robust enough to measure every aspect of a call and indicate special causes for concern or trends in performance standards, if any. The design of this measurement system should be in consensus with internal and external customers.

    The evaluation parameters can be broadly classified under:

    • Standard opening and closing
    • Soft skills including communication and listening skills, computer skills, etc.
    • Content knowledge, follow-up and escalation initiative
    • Customer service skills
    • English usage

    The monitoring and evaluation of calls has to be regular and should be conducted using a standardized set of parameters. These parameters should be customized to detect variance in performance for all types of products and services. Weighted values are assigned to each parameter that will finally amount to a percentage score. The sample size of total scores for analysis depends on the frequency of evaluation during a period of time. The evaluated individual scores can be assigned to performance buckets plotted against the total number of scores. This trend analysis classifies the individuals who need improvement and also the progress in a particular performance segment.

     Figure 1: Monthly Performance Statistics

    In Figure 1, the dip in the trend in the first two segments (< 70% and 70-79.99%) has resulted in a considerable incline in performance in the other two segments. The scores in the first two segments are scrutinized and a skill-wise analysis is done on these calls. Special observations are made for trends in poor performance, if any.

    The process capability is calculated with respect to the target (Cp) and customer expectations (Cpk). This defines the performance within the customer expectations and the spread of data beyond the desired limits.

    The fish bone diagram (Figure 2) further identifies the factors contributing to the low call quality. The observed factors leading to poor call quality are analysed to identify further potential drivers of each factor.

     Figure 2: Fishbone Diagram

    The impact of the major output factors is correlated to the key input factors. The recurring and major contributing factors are further affined to a greater detail. A definite action plan can be drawn up to address these factors. This chain of analysis is completed with the Pareto chart that prioritizes the biggest areas of concern – key process output variables – in order of the impact on the project's Y.

     Figure 3: Pareto Chart

    The critical-to-quality factors are prioritized and the factors responsible for the delivery are identified.

    Critical to QualityCritical to Delivery
    Hold TimeTechnology
    Content Knowledge
    Soft Skills
    Supervisory Help Available
    Call Volume
    Cross-Selling TechniquesSpecialized Sales Training
    Nature of Call
    Soft Skills and Call Handling Skills
    Customer Service Skills
    Updating of Customer InformationApplications Used
    Call Volume
    Escalation Mechanism
    Content Knowledge
    Written Communication Skills
    Summarization and ParaphrasingCommunication Skills
    English Usage
    Active Listening
    Content Knowledge

    An improvement plan is devised on these critical improvement factors and subsequently a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is conducted to find out the impact of the actions taken. Discrete control charts are implemented to check for repeatability and reproducibility of the evaluators. This need not be done in case of software used for evaluation, e.g., speech and accent evaluation software. Variance or bias in evaluations between different evaluators can be caused due to perception of evaluation parameters, individual competency or even fatigue and shift timings.

     Figure 4: Control Charts 

    Chi square test can be conducted to check for the effect of shift timings on the quality of calls and performance of evaluators, the null hypothesis of which is mostly the case in a realistic scenario. The FMEA is further scrutinized to improve on the action to obtain optimum customer satisfaction. This cycle is repeated after the implementation of the action plan.

    About the Author: Nandan Ramaswamy is a Six Sigma Black Belt with experience in market research. He worked for five years in call centers including four years of quality standards implementation including ISO 9001:2000 standards and Six Sigma. Key professional specialties include process migration and improvement and call monitoring and evaluation. He can be reached at nandanramaswamy@rediffmail.com.

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 4.29
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright © 2000-2008 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.


    "The Bottom Line" Links
    BMG
    UNIVERSITY
    |
    Lean Six Sigma
    Online
    |
    . Reduce Travel Costs
    . Maximize Training Budget
    >> Get Certified Now..
    VILLANOVA
    UNIVERSITY
      Earn Your Lean, Green or Black Belt Six Sigma Master Certificate Online
    BOOST YOUR SALARY! *$38k more than uncertified counterparts. Learn From Industry Leaders!
      START NOW

    SIGMAPRO

    MBB, Lean Sigma, & DFSS

     

    when experience matters most...

    M O T O R O L A
    U N I V E R S I T Y
    Learn from the most experienced
    practitioners of Six Sigma in the world

    Public Training & Certification
    Click here to take a free Six Sigma Lesson
    J

    URΛN

     
    Lean Six Sigma Public Workshops
    Atlanta, GA - Sept 2008
    Become one of your organization's 'vital few'. Get Juran Certified.
     
    Finding that key person for your
    team is just a click away . . .
       
    TheJobShop

    jobs.isixsigma.com
         
    THE UNIVERSITY OF
    TEXAS
    AT AUSTIN

    2 weeks + 1 project = Black Belt Certification
    .
    Find us on LinkedIn
    Join the iSixSigma Network
    and Connect with Other Six Sigma Pros
    .
    .
    iSixSigma Live! Summit & Awards
    Jan 13-16, 2009 • Miami, FL
    Save up to $700 • Click Here!
    Register by August 14
    .


    Download the iSixSigma Toolbar for 1-Click access. Search Your Way. Everyday. Without Delay.
    Get 1-Click iSixSigma access. Search Your Way. Everyday. Without Delay.

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    2. Gage R&R Excel Template
      Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) studies measure the amount of measurement variation that is attributabl...
    3. Root Cause Analysis Course
      Having worked in the quality organization for over 20 years, the developers of this course have continually ran into cor...
    4. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    5. 2008 VERSION! Six Sigma DMAIC Training Slides
      The complete Lean Six Sigma DMAIC course prepares participants to perform the role of a LSS Black Belt; covering what’s ...
    6. NEW VERSION! Process Management Training Slides
      The OSSS Process Management course is designed in two phases comprised of:352 Powerpoint slidesInstructor notesSlide exp...
    7. NEW VERSION! Six Sigma Green Belt Training Slides
      The OSSS Six Sigma Green Belt course is comprised of: 1047 slidesInstructor notesSlide explanations35 data sets20 suppo...
     

    Six Sigma AdLinks
    Rath & Strong
    Quality Companion 2: Improve your quality project execution
    SBTI Public Offerings, World Class MBB, Lean Enterprise
    SigmaXL: User Friendly Excel Add-ins for Statistical and Graphical Analysis
    Smarter Solutions Makes Lean Six Sigma Easier
    SigmaWorks: A complete toolbox for LSS & DFSS
    Michigan Engineering - Six Sigma Certifications
    @RISK for Six Sigma and quality analysis
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. ©2000-2008 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 4.2-A-244
    About iSixSigma · Contact Us · Privacy Policy · Site Map
    nogeo