Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Methodologies  > DMADV / DFSS / IDOV / New Product/Service Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
Nominations for iSixSigma Awards! close November 30 – nominate your project/program today!
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  Live! Home
  2010 Summit & Awards
  2010 Energy Forum
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
   BPR
   DMAIC
   Kaizen
   Metrics
   Six Sigma
   TQM
   Work-Out
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Connections Between Design for Six Sigma and CMMI

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "There is no connection between Six Sigma and CMMI-5. Six Sigma talks about the end results but CMMI emphasis is in means to achieve it. Six Sigma has nothing to do with process but data. You can use whatever corrective means you apply to get better results...."

    Contribute to this Discussion
    Download Products

    By Gary A. Gack

    While there are more than a few connections between the Six Sigma DMAIC roadmap and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), some practitioners may not be aware of the connections between CMMI and Design for Six Sigma (DFSS). CMMI has four process categories, each contains several process areas that are associated with a maturity level (Table 1). Process areas most strongly connected to DFSS are those in the engineering process category.

    Table 1: Breakdown of Four Process Categories of CMMI
    Process
    Category 
    Process
    Area

    Mat.
    Level

    Process
    Mgmt.
    Organizational Process Definition
    Organizational Process Focus
    Organizational Training
    Organizational Process Performance
    Organizational Innovation/Deployment

    3
    3
    3
    4
    5

    Project
    Mgmt.
    Project Planning
    Project Monitoring and Control
    Supplier Agreement Management
    Integrated Project Management for IPPD
    Risk Management
    Integrated Teaming
    Integrated supplier Management
    Quantitative Project Management

    2
    2
    2
    3
    3
    3
    3
    4

    EngineeringRequirements Management
    Requirements Development
    Technical Solution
    Product Integration
    Verification
    Validation

    2
    3
    3
    3
    3
    3

    SupportConfiguration Management
    Process and Product Quality Assurance
    Measurement and Analysis
    Decision Analysis and Resolution
    Organizational Environment for Integration
    Causal Analysis and Resolution

    2
    2
    2
    3

    3
    5



     





     

     

     

     

     

     


     

     

     

     

     

     

    DFSS Connections to Engineering Process Areas

    Requirements Development (RD) has three goals – (1) to develop customer requirements; (2) to develop product requirements, including characterization of operational concepts and use scenarios (allocating customer requirements to system elements such as hardware, software and people); and (3) to analyze and validate requirements (ensuring that they are necessary and sufficient and that they appropriately balance stakeholder needs and constraints).

    The goal of the Requirements Management (REQM) process area is to manage requirements in order to ensure consistency with plans and work products. REQM entails five specific practices, several of which have direct connections to DFSS.

    • Understand the requirements.
    • Obtain a commitment from those who will implement the requirements.
    • Manage changes to the requirements, including change history.
    • Provide bi-directional traceability between requirements and related work products.
    • Identify inconsistencies between the requirements and project plans and work products.

    These practices connect most directly to the Define and Measure phases of the DFSS DMADV roadmap depicted in Figures 1 and 2.

     Figure 1: DMADV Roadmap and Toolkit – Define

    Step D2 in the DFSS/DMADV roadmap addresses elicitation of customer requirements, including careful distinction of needs specifically identified by the customer, and context data that indicates needs that are easily missed – the "latent" requirements. Context data describes the customer environment and often provides insight that clarifies the "why" behind the requirements and thereby facilitates the understanding required for effective requirements management.

    Step D3 focuses attention on the critical-to-quality (CTQ) requirements that drive success – distinguishing them from the routine many. In this step, measures are associated with the CTQs, thereby providing additional insight that facilitates understanding, clarifies ambiguities and establishes the framework necessary for early acceptance testing planning. As test planning will often find as many defects as does testing, the definition of measures at this early stage leads to significant improvements in the quality of the requirements.

     Figure 2: DMADV Roadmap and Toolkit – Measure

    Step M1 deals with prioritization issues and facilitates balancing of customer needs and constraints in a quantified and reviewable manner that can be revisited whenever changes in requirements occur.

    Step M2 includes Y-to-x flowdown, a technique that identifies the lower level factors that must be controlled or optimized in order to satisfy the CTQ requirements. This incorporates one of the central concepts of Six Sigma, Y = f(x) – i.e., Y, an outcome typically not directly controllable, is driven by or is a function of one or more x's, or factors that are controllable and must be carefully addressed.

    Step M3 entails planning for and collecting data relevant to measurement success in meeting the requirements of the customer.

    Technical Solution (TS) is the third process process area within CMMI's engineering category. This process area has three goals – to select the solution, to develop the design and to implement the design. Selecting the solution aligns most directly with the Analyze phase of the DFSS/DMADV roadmap (Figure 3).

     Figure 3: DMADV Roadmap and Toolkit – Analyze

    Step A1 uses measures and data to develop a statistically sound understanding of the transfer functions that connect relevant x's to Ys of interest – in other words, determining which factors are the most important and quantifying the strength of the relationships that exist. This approach guides selection of alternative solution concepts or architectures.

    Step A2 generates alternative concepts and uses tools such as the concept selection scorecard to guide the evaluation and selection among the feature and architecture alternatives identified. This step produces a product strategy that articulates the concept selected and the feature set to be provided.

    Step A3 evaluates alternatives with respect to implementation strategy. This assessment evaluates the business value impact of schedule/cost/quality alternatives. For example, which is best in this situation – fast delivery at a higher cost and lower quality, later delivery date with higher quality and lower cost, or delivering less functionality as a compromise?

    Developing and implementing the design align most directly with the DFSS/DMADV Design/Build phase (Figure 4). This is primarily in the realm of traditional software engineering practices, and Six Sigma typically plays a smaller role, often related to optimization of certain aspects of performance.

    Verification and Validation are the final two process areas within the engineering category. They align most directly with the Verify phase of the DFSS/DMADV roadmap (Figure 5).

     Figure 4: DMADV Roadmap and Toolkit – Design/Build

     Figure 5: DMADV Roadmap and Toolkit – Verify

    Conclusion: A Synergistic Combination

    Six Sigma is being used successfully in conjunction with CMMI in many organizations. Both are powerful in themselves and highly synergistic in combination. 

    About the Author: Gary A. Gack is a founding partner of Six Sigma Advantage, based in Rockland, Massachusetts, USA. He has an MBA from the Wharton School, is an ASQ-certified software quality engineer and a Six Sigma Black Belt. During his 40-year career in the software and IT industry, he has managed a variety of large-scale software projects and has consulted with dozens of Fortune 1000 firms. Mr. Gack co-authored Six Sigma Advantage's Black Belt, Green Belt and foundation curriculum. He can be reached at ggack@sixsigma-advantage.com.

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 4.00
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright � 2000-2009 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.




    "The Bottom Line" Links

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Six Sigma Black Belt (DMAIC) Training Slides - 2009 Version!
      The 2009 Six Sigma Black Belt course includes over 40 more slides than the 2008 version. Contents include: 1,220 PowerPo...
    2. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    3. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    4. Kaizen Workshop E-book
      This 150+ page ebook teaches key tools and techniques of Kaizen, as well as real application to enhance learning. Kaizen...
    5. Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) E-Book or Print
      Need an "encyclopedia" consisting of many of the tools you’ll study? Need a helpful refresher to apply the DFSS process?...
    6. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt E-book
      In 670 pages learn everything within the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC body of knowledge to successfully achieve Black Belt certi...
    7. Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training Slides - 2009 Version
      The 2009 Six Sigma Yellow Belt course is comprised of: 503 slidesInstructor notesSlide explanations15 data sets19 suppo...
     
    Six Sigma AdLinks
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. �2000-2009 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 0.1
    About iSixSigmaContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map