Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
Online Training from BMG University Air Academy Six Sigma Certifications from Villanova University Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Methodologies  > Process Management Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
2008 Version! DMAIC Training Slides: 1,176 Slides + Instructor Notes and More for $99.95
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  iSixSigma Live! Summit
  Agenda
  Registration Info
  Breakthrough Awards
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
   BPR
   DMAIC
   Kaizen
   Metrics
   Six Sigma
   TQM
   Work-Out
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Achieving Yokoten in the Process of Risk Management

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "What are some measurement methods that can be used during process auditing to measure risk levels besides FMEA's?"

    Contribute to this Discussion

    B
    Download Products
    y Muthuvelan Varadharajulu and Carsten Rommel

    Risk management is a systematic and disciplined process to handle risks in every aspect of a project, including project management and technical aspects. Yet despite the need to handle risk management with care, Six Sigma teams and others involved in projects can get ahead of the curve on addressing risks via yokoten.

    In general, risk management comprises the following major steps:

    • Assess the risks, i.e., access continuously what could go wrong.
    • Prioritize the risks, i.e., determine which risks are important to deal with based on risk priority number.
    • Manage abatement actions, i.e., plan and implement actions necessary to reduce the impact or the possibility of occurrence of risks.

    There are different techniques that can be applied in risk management. These techniques vary predominantly in the way the risks are evaluated. For example, the risks may be evaluated or ranked based on their severity (the negative impact of the risk to the project) and probability (the probability of occurrence of the risk). This is generally followed in handling project management risks. Whereas in techniques such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), which are widely used in handling technical risks, the risks are evaluated based on their severity, probability and detectability (the likelihood of preventing or detecting the occurrence of risk). In any case, risk management process plays a major role and is very critical for effectively managing a project.

    Figure 1: Risk
    Management Process

    Figure 1 illustrates a generic model of the risk management process. This process needs to be repeated periodically throughout the life cycle of projects. The periodicity may vary according to the criticality and/or size of the project. Accordingly, project teams identify the risks, evaluate and prioritize the risks based on the risk priority number. The project teams then plan and implement the abatement actions according to the priority to avoid or reduce the negative effect of the risks on the projects.

    Yokoten: From One Place to Another

    Generally, each project team performs the risk management activities and retains what it learns within the project. Thus many of the things learned from various projects need to be reinvented in new projects. This consumes lot of effort, time and money that could be avoided if there is a process and mechanism by which whatever is learned from one project is shared among other projects. This is where the Japanese term yokoten, which means taking from one place to another, gets prime attention. Yokoten emphasizes learning at an organizational level through sharing of the best practices from one project to other similar projects. In risk management practices, the identified risks and the corresponding abatement actions provide an immense learning opportunity among projects. Hence, achieving yokoten for risk management is essential for knowledge sharing among projects.

    One method of passing on what is learned is to make each new project to go through the risk management documents (risk sheets or FMEA) of other completed projects.

    This is a cumbersome process and has the following constraints:

    • Effort constraint: This requires lot of effort as new project need to review the risk management documents of all completed projects.
    • Time constraint: Sharing of information among concurrent projects is very difficult.
    • Location constraint: If projects are handled in different locations, sharing of information is much more difficult.

    Hence, there is a need for an automated, database solution for risk management process for seamless information sharing among projects, irrespective of location, time and so on.

    Regarding the knowledge sharing aspect in risk management, there are two important scenarios with respect to time that need to be considered:

    • Vertical: Learnings passed on from the completed projects to new projects.
    • Horizontal: Learnings shared among concurrent projects.

    Sharing Information from Completed Projects

    In this case, owners of the completed projects need to identify the risks and abatement actions that could be applied to other similar projects and provide such inputs to build a generic risk database, as shown in Figure 2. Care should be exercised while providing such inputs, as only those information that is generic or applicable to future projects need to be provided. Otherwise the generic risk database will quickly become very large and cumbersome.

     Figure 2: Generic Risk Database

    A panel of technical experts should review the submitted generic risks and approve the items as appropriate. The panel of technical experts for risk management may be a virtual team comprised of a group of technical experts from various teams based on the fields (e.g., software, electronics, etc.). These approved generic risks will then be appended to the generic risk database. While starting a new project, the leader of the project would need to go through the generic risk database and identify those risks and abatement actions that are applicable to the new project for carrying out the risk management activities.

    Considering the generic risk database: A number of factors should be taken into account:

    • Compatibility: The generic risk database needs to be compatible with the risk management documents (risk sheets or FMEA) used by various projects. Consider the fields, columns or header information.
    • Risk description: A good guideline to describe a risk needs to be in place. Good risk descriptions will facilitate locating the appropriate risk easily.
    • Category/subcategory: For locating the appropriate risk, it is best to define and assign the categories for risks. The following are some examples of categories:
      • Product classifications
      • Process classifications
      • Project's lifecycle – requirement, design, manufacturing, testing, etc.
      • Project management risks – cost, schedule, quality, etc
    • Maintenance: Maintenance of the contents of the generic risk database needs to be in defined at organizational level. (For example, the panel of technical experts may review the generic risk database periodically and make recommendations such as adding or deleting risks, updating the risk rating and so on).
    • Maximum risk rating: In general, as any project progresses, based on the identification and completion of the abatement actions, the corresponding risk rating may gradually reduce. However, while providing the risk information upon completion of the project as an input to the generic risk database, the maximum rating of the risk during its lifecycle needs to be considered.
    • Notification: Notification needs to be made to the project teams on changes to the generic risk database, if any. (For example, during the reviews by the technical experts, if the definition or rating of a particular risk is updated in the generic risk database, the same should be notified to the appropriate projects.)

    Sharing Information Among Concurrent Projects

    There are two different scenarios for sharing information among the concurrent projects.

    Figure 3: Risk Management Database --
    Copying Risks

    1. Sharing information among independent but similar projects – copying: The risk information can be copied from one project to other projects and can be maintained in the respective projects, as shown in Figure 3. This will be useful when two different projects are similar in nature but are to be handled independently.

    As an example: Assume two independent but similar projects Project A and Project B and a risk Ra1 of Project A is copied to Project B. In this case, the risk information will be stored under a new risk in Project B, say Rb5, and the ownership of Ra1 is with Project A and the ownership of Rb5 is with Project B. Hence the risks are independent of each other.

    2. Sharing information among dependent projects – linking: The risks of the dependent projects could be linked from one project to other projects as shown in Figure 4. This will be useful in projects that are related by parent-child or child-child relationship. In this case a risk of a particular project is still maintained in that project but instances are created wherever required for monitoring.

    Figure 4: Risk Management Database --
    Linking Risks

    As an example: Assume two projects that are related – a parent project (Project A) and a child project (Project B). Assume that a risk, Rb1 of project B is linked to Project A. In this case, the ownership of Rb1 is with Project B but it is referred/monitored in Project A as well. The reason is that the success of Project A depends on Project B but the ownership of reducing the effect of the risk Rb1 is with Project B.

    From Completed and Concurrent Projects

    While developing a database solution for risk management, it is reasonable to consider that a risk from any project, dependent or independent, could be copied or linked to any other project, as shown in Figure 5. This approach will broaden the model of the database solution for risk management and facilitate a greater sharing of what is learned among various projects.

    Hence, the database solution for risk management will have the following two sections:

    • Generic risk database
    • Project risk database

    The project risk database further contains the following two sections:

    • A section for capturing project specific risks.
    • A section to link the risks that are related to a particular project but are maintained in other projects.

     Figure 5: Risk Management Database

    Conclusion: Understand Risks Earlier and Better

    In general, each project team maintains a "to-do" list derived from a work breakdown structure. This list is reviewed periodically and is important for signing-off milestones. Usually this list also is maintained in databases. It is highly desirable to link the abatement actions resulting from the risk management activities with the to-do list of the project. Care should be taken to maintain traceability from both sides – abatement actions and to-do list).

    Achieving yokoten for risk management makes the organization understand the risks, earlier and better. This facilitates the project teams to plan the actions proactively to avoid risks at an early stage of projects rather than to act reactively. That will save lots of time, effort and money. In addition to facilitating yokoten through the organizational learning, the database solution for risk management also enhances transparency among projects and brings about uniformity with respect to handling risks.

    About the Authors: Muthuvelan Varadharajulu is with Robert Bosch India Ltd. and is currently at the Chassis System Control division within the Bosch Group in Germany. One of his roles there is as the process expert for risk management. He has 17 years of industry experience and is a GE-certified Black Belt. He has more than 10 patents to his credit. Mr. Varadharajulu can be reached muthuvelan.v@in.bosch.com. Carsten Rommel has been working for the Bosch Group for seven years, during which time he has held several positions in the division Chassis Systems Control division in Germany and Australia. He currently works as a manager within the software and system development area. In addition, he is the process owner for risk management at Chassis Systems Control. Mr. Rommel can be reached at carsten.rommel@de.bosch.com.

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 4.08
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright © 2000-2008 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.


    "The Bottom Line" Links

    1BMG
    UNIVERSITY
    .
    I
    I
    Lean Six Sigma
    Online
    I
    I
    Reduce Travel Costs
    Maximize Training Budget

    VILLANOVA
    UNIVERSITY
      Earn Your Lean, Green or Black Belt Six Sigma Master Certificate Online
    BOOST YOUR SALARY! *$38k more than uncertified counterparts. Learn From Industry Leaders!
      START NOW

    SIGMAPRO

    MBB, Lean Sigma, & DFSS

     

    when experience matters most...

    M O T O R O L A
    U N I V E R S I T Y
    Learn from the most experienced
    practitioners of Six Sigma in the world

    Public Training & Certification
    Click here to take a free Six Sigma Lesson

    JURΛN

    2009 Lean Six Sigma Public Workshops - SPECIAL OFFER!
    Register for any course before December 31st and receive 50% off any additional registrations, plus receive free consulting support! Call 800-338-7726 to register.

    LodeStar Institute

    |

    Live Lean Six Sigma Training

    Starting at $660

     WHY SETTLE FOR ONLINE? GET LIVE TRAINING AND PROJECT MENTORING FOR ONLINE PRICES.
    Finding that key person for your
    team is just a click away . . .
       
    TheJobShop

    jobs.isixsigma.com
         
    THE UNIVERSITY OF
    TEXAS
    AT AUSTIN

    2 weeks + 1 project = Black Belt Certification
    .
    Find us on LinkedIn
    Join the iSixSigma Network
    and Connect with Other Six Sigma Pros
    .
    .
    iSixSigma Live! Summit & Awards
    Jan 13-16, 2009 • Miami, FL
    Save up to $200.00 • Click Here!
    Space is Limited! Hurry!
    .

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    2. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    3. 5S Training Course
      One of the key fundamental tools of process improvement is 5S. 5S is a methodology for organizing and minimizing item...
    4. Six Sigma Black Belt (DMAIC) Training Slides
      The 2008 Six Sigma Black Belt course is comprised of: 1,176 PowerPoint slides, Instructor notes, Slide explanations, 37 ...
    5. Six Sigma DMAIC Training Slides
      The complete 2008 Lean Six Sigma DMAIC course prepares participants to perform the role of a LSS Black Belt; covering wh...
    6. Gage R&R Excel Template
      Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) studies measure the amount of measurement variation that is attributabl...
    7. CSSBB Preparation Pack
      The CSSBB Preparation Pack includes materials for passing the Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (CSSBB) exam. This CSSBB Pr...
     
    Six Sigma AdLinks
    Rath & Strong
    Learn statistics online with Quality Trainer by Minitab
    SBTI Public Offerings, World Class MBB, Lean Enterprise
    SigmaXL: User Friendly Excel Add-ins for Statistical and Graphical Analysis
    Smarter Solutions Makes Lean Six Sigma Easier
    SigmaWorks: A complete toolbox for LSS & DFSS
    Michigan Engineering - Six Sigma Certifications
    @RISK for Six Sigma and quality analysis
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. ©2000-2008 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 2.4-A-244
    About iSixSigma · Contact Us · Privacy Policy · Site Map
    nogeo