Six Sigma Quality Resources for Achieving Six Sigma Results
Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
 Home > Methodologies  > Process Management Search:
 
 for    
Publications
Marketplace
| iSixSigma
Stuff
| iSixSigma
Blogosphere
| Events
Calendar
| The
Dictionary
| Discussion
Forum
| Find
a Job
| Post
a Job
| Industry
News
| Newsletter
Signup
| Sigma
Calculator
| Online
Surveys
Nominations for iSixSigma Awards! close November 30 – nominate your project/program today!
iSixSigma Magazine Signup
 iSixSigma Live!  
  Live! Home
  2010 Summit & Awards
  2010 Energy Forum
 Free Newsletters!  
  Sign Up Now!
  Manage Subscriptions
  New To Six Sigma?
  Six Sigma Q&A
  Cert. Practice Test
  Problem Solving Wizard
  ISSSP Info
ISSSP Is The Official Six Sigma Society of iSixSigma
 Channels 
  Europe
  Financial Services
  Healthcare
  Military
  Software / IT
 Quality Directory 
  Best Practices
  Certifications/Awards
  Consultants
  Culture Evolution
  Methodologies
   BPR
   DMAIC
   Kaizen
   Metrics
   Six Sigma
   TQM
   Work-Out
  News & Events
  Organizations
  Product/Service Guides
  Statistics & Analysis
  Tools & Templates
  Voice of the Customer
  Free Whitepapers
 Related Topics 
  Innovation
  Outsourcing/Offshoring
  Business Process Mgt
 Quick Access 
  Help
  Search
  Advertise Here
  Article Archives
  Newsletter Archives
 User Feedback 
  Please suggest site
  improvements.
 
  [ larger form ]

Review All Components for Well-rounded Process Analysis

Bookmark This Page Bookmark This Page
Email This Page Email This Page
Format for Printing Format for Printing
Cite This Article Cite This Article
Submit an Article Submit an Article
Six Sigma Article Archive Read More Articles
Related Tools & Articles
  • Discussion Forum
    "I've been asked to do a review of a particular process in my organization. I want to use my Six Sigma skills, but I'm looking for some help in the best way to approach this. How would you approach this?"

    Contribute to this Discussion
    Download Products

    By Paola Mauri

    Several management approaches, including Six Sigma, involve a key focus on process analysis. Too often processes are schematically represented in boxes and arrows. While this final result of a process analysis is beneficial, practitioners should ensure they are considering the numerous factors and components that influence a process and how it is viewed.

    Stakeholders and Points of View

    Consider a well-defined activity, such as a manufacturing process. For the same manufacturing process, the inputs, outputs, risks and metrics may differ for various stakeholders (Table 1).

    Table 1: Examples of Different Factors for Different Stakeholders
    StakeholderKey Factors
    ShareholdersCosts and benefits
    CustomersProduct information and contract requirements
    NeighborsAir emissions
    WorkersSafety

    The workers, equipment and instructions used to complete an operation are viewed as tools, resources and costs for customers and shareholders, for example, but the reference system changes when viewed from the workers’ eyes. For instance, maintenance tasks completed to support production capability also can be seen as part of worker safety improvement. The same process activity provides different benefits for different stakeholders.

    Tangibles and Intangibles

    Another component of process analysis is the results produced by the process. Consider, for instance, the criteria of tangible or intangible results and assume the customer point of view. A product could be described by several characteristics that can be concrete and perceived by a customer (the taste of a flavor), and measured and recorded on different media (for instance, the report of a control plan). A result of a manufacturing process is a “product,” but the output described on a process map is, for instance, the record of a particular metric. This is not the “true” product, but the point of view of quality for this product.

    Some outputs can be easily described through measurable and evident characteristics (e.g., a mechanical part), others require a deep evaluation of customer relationships. This customer relationship aspect is mainly stressed in service organizations. In these service cases, the results of processes are mainly outcomes rather than outputs, underlining the importance of interactions between the organization and the customer. Figure 1 shows the processes and outcomes for sample education and training activities.

    Figure 1: Education and Training Processes

    The result of a student’s education is codified by judgment and translated into grades on report cards; these reports represent the visible output of education activities. However, many aspects of a student’s performance, such as behavior, relationships and motivations, cannot be easily translated in summarized descriptions and require a different notation. School outputs are deeply influenced by student-teacher and student-student interactions. Hence, students are co-makers of learning processes. In this case, the quality of service depends on the motivation and involvement of the customers and suppliers.  

    Similarly, consider clinical processes and their results. The result of a diagnosis and therapy process is usually synthesized in clinical records as evidence of disease and its evolution. This status could be influenced by patient-physician or patient-nurse relationships, as well as by the whole set of hospital services (e.g., reception, cafeteria, cleaning). Often these services are more important in patient perception than the clinical ones.

    Capturing all these concurrent and multi-level hospital service activities in a process analysis is a challenge, and the points of view of the hospital and patient can be very different. The summary of all tangible and intangible inputs and outputs requires a wide-ranging process map (Figure 2).

    Figure 2: Healthcare Services Process Map

    Detail Levels and Metrics

    Detail level is the most complex component of process analysis. First, practitioners must define system boundaries, and what is inside and outside the process scope. Once the “building” has been defined, the number of “floors” is influenced by many variables: organization characteristics, key events and risks.

    As for the description of physical process activities, a time axis can be added to the space axis. The time is a measure across process activities, for instance through the phases of a buying process or as cycle time in a customer order management process (Figure 3). Time is also a key reference in management improvement. Analysis describes a process “as is” with the aim to figure out the process that “will be” in the future, in relation to improvement targets.

    Figure 3: Purchasing Process and Time

    Capturing the Process

    A process analysis also requires competence, experience and sensitivity from the people involved in identifying and describing the steps of the process. People often describe the same activities differently. In particular, a good description requires the person doing the analysis to involve the process owners. To have useful results, it is important to calibrate and smooth out subjective

    Process Map Necessities

    A quality process map requires good notation tools. These tools must:

    • Be able to clearly identify multiple inputs and outputs, and process interactions.
    • Be able to represent serial processes (e.g., manufacturing process phases) and parallel processes (e.g., a concurrent engineering process) and to describe the chain backward and forward.
    • Be able to easily describe several detail levels and to link them with proper process owners.
    interpretations; several interpretations and interests can often be present in the same area. A working group can help the analyst in averaging the different evaluations and reducing the bias.

    The subjective bias also can be reduced by supporting evaluations with information related to process metrics and results. For instance, the different perceptions, between production and service areas, of the time for maintenance intervention can be solved by registering and measuring timing data.

    Even the point of view of the practitioner completing the analysis influences the building of the management model. If the analysis is driven by the goals of a management system, interviews with process owners may be conditioned by those requirements. It is important to avoid predetermined targets becoming the only focus of analysis.

    Return on Analysis Investment

    Mapping process can be a complex task; however, the investment should give returns that are related to tangible and intangible results. Some advantages of process analysis and mapping:

     • Improves detection of management bottleneck

     • Allows for a better definition of metrics and correlation with management models (I.e., responsibilities, operating procedures, information flows)

     • Provides a useful backbone for risk analysis and management

    • Aids in human resource management to improve concurrent behaviors and to prevent undesired ones, and to facilitate employee communication, motivation and involvement.

    About The Author: Paola Mauri is a senior consultant in STAR srl, a consultancy devoted to system management (quality, environment and safety). Her areas of expertise encompass process analysis and improvement, particularly for clinical, educational and administrative organizations. She can be reached at starsis@tin.it.

     
    Rate This Article:  Current Rating: 3.29
      Poor    Excellent     
              1    2    3     4    5
    Copyright � 2000-2009 iSixSigma – All Rights Reserved
    Reproduction Without Permission Is Strictly Prohibited – Copyright Requests


    Publish an Article: Do you have a Six Sigma tip, learning or case study?
    Share it with the largest community of Six Sigma professionals, and be recognized by your peers.
    It's a great way to promote your expertise and/or build your resume. Read more about submitting an article.




    "The Bottom Line" Links

    BEST SELLING PRODUCTS (iSixSigma Publications)
    1. Six Sigma Black Belt (DMAIC) Training Slides - 2009 Version!
      The 2009 Six Sigma Black Belt course includes over 40 more slides than the 2008 version. Contents include: 1,220 PowerPo...
    2. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Assessment Exam
      Interested in assessing your knowledge of Lean Six Sigma? Preparing for certifications? Testing your students and traine...
    3. Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Assessment Exam
      This assessment exam is useful for students interested in assessing their knowledge of Lean Six Sigma on the Green Belt ...
    4. Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt E-book
      In 670 pages learn everything within the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC body of knowledge to successfully achieve Black Belt certi...
    5. Kaizen Workshop E-book
      This 150+ page ebook teaches key tools and techniques of Kaizen, as well as real application to enhance learning. Kaizen...
    6. Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training Slides - 2009 Version
      The 2009 Six Sigma Yellow Belt course is comprised of: 503 slidesInstructor notesSlide explanations15 data sets19 suppo...
    7. Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) E-Book or Print
      Need an "encyclopedia" consisting of many of the tools you’ll study? Need a helpful refresher to apply the DFSS process?...
     
    Six Sigma AdLinks
    AdLinks Information


    Google AdWords
     
    Home | Discussion Forum | Event Calendar | Job Shop
    Link To iSixSigma | Rate This Page | Report A Problem | Free Content For Your Site | Submit Article For Publishing
     Terms of Service. �2000-2009 iSixSigma. All rights reserved. v3.0lb, 0.1
    About iSixSigmaContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map