FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2014
Font Size
Implementation Case Studies Increasing Cath Lab Capacity Through Six Sigma

Increasing Cath Lab Capacity Through Six Sigma

Healthcare organizations currently implementing Six Sigma are finding no shortage of opportunities for applying this approach – and many are reaping substantial benefits in terms of cost, quality and productivity. One area increasingly targeted in recent years has been the cardiac catheterization lab, which is generally a high-volume, challenging and complex environment within any healthcare facility.

When the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) began working on improvement initiatives, the cath lab surfaced as an area of opportunity, given recent changes in patient flow and efficiency. With the type of resource constraints facing many hospitals today, the hospital knew that growth in terms of additional space and staff was not possible at that point, so it sought alternate options for meeting demand and generating additional revenue.

UPMC Cath Lab Project

Project Goal: Improve patient throughput and on-time performance

Findings:

  • Average case 22 minutes late
  • In-room wait times 25 minutes
  • Room turnaround time (TAT) averages 30 minutes
  • Infrastructure, staffing and management support available to make changes

Solutions:

  • Short Term – Identified opportunity to redeploy staff and utilize holding area to reduce room TAT by 15 minutes. Brought in-room wait and room TAT to specification levels.
  • Long-Term – Identified opportunity to modify scheduling practices that reduce total case time, and improve patient throughput.

Results: 

  • Increased capacity by 2.08 patients per lab/per day, Mon.-Fri. (250 days per year)
  • Potential financial impact of $5.2m annually @ $2,500/case 

The Project Begins

A Six Sigma team was formed and launched a DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) project to look at the volume of cath lab cases and how they might improve capacity and revenue while decreasing costs. As part of the initial Define phase of the project, the team set clear objectives for improving workflow in the lab and removing any unnecessary roadblocks from existing processes.

In the Measure phase, the team began to closely examine and measure all aspects of cath lab performance including pre-case, exam time, and post-case processes to determine impact on patient scheduling, overtime and capacity. It collected cycle-time data for analysis, beginning from the time the patient enters the room. Factors such as how the patient enters the system, when the cath lab is prepared and the time it takes to prepare the patient for the procedure were taken into account.

By analyzing the data, the project team found that patients were often in the lab earlier than necessary – on average 14 extra minutes – from the time they entered until they were ready for draping, scrub and IV preparation. This additional 14 minutes was identified as wasted time, and the project focused on identifying and eliminating the root causes for the variation and delay.

Analysis of the data during the Analyze phase also revealed that although two hours were blocked for each procedure, the actual case time was only 55 minutes – less than half the total time the patient was in the room. To reduce room turnaround time, they set a target of 10 minutes for cases to start on time, with a beginning baseline average of 22 minutes. They were able to bring this into specification levels through Six Sigma and process changes implemented during the Improve phase such as redeploying staff and using a holding area for patients.

Involving and Mobilizing the Staff

Along with Six Sigma, the use of change management tools helped; the team create a shared need and build acceptance. Members of the staff at UPMC realized they had a great opportunity for improving the capacity of the cardiac cath lab and remained engaged in this initiative. They managed the project closely, with oversight from the director of the lab, who supported the effort and sought to remove any barriers staff identified.

As part of this process, it was clear to staff from the beginning that there was a possibility they might end up reducing personnel. At the time this project began, UPMC had roughly a 50 percent turnover rate in nurses and vacancies with lab technicians. By improving workflow, redeploying some of the staff and not filling existing vacancies, however, they were able to avoid eliminating anyone from the center’s workforce.

The staff is not feeling that same sense of being stretched too thin, and job satisfaction has gone up. With the added efficiencies, UPMC found it needed only four labs instead of five.

Impressive Results

At the start of the project, the post-procedural area had contributed to delays because there were not enough beds available for patients, but this process was streamlined. The team also significantly reduced pre-procedure waiting time. UPMC has been able to add a case per day, and the added capacity translates to potential financial impact of an additional $5.2 million per year in revenue. The changes also are helping to improve services for patients, and staff mentioned that this is almost a reinvestment in the lab.

The “in-room wait time” began with a baseline of 33 minutes total time. As the project entered the Control phase, this had been reduced to 4.8 minutes. The lab also went from a turnaround time of 51 minutes to 20 minutes, and the physician response time did not change much.

“The leadership at UPMC is very supportive of this approach,” said Joyce Smith, assistant director in the cath lab at the time. “If you’re able through efficiencies to reduce expenses and gain revenue, then you have a larger contribution margin to run the business.”

A dashboard used in the Control phase looks at the whole scheduling process, arrival times, time to the lab, how cases are scheduled and whether timing is staying on track. “We’ve done some follow up activities to keep the momentum going,” Smith said. “Everyone involved took this project very seriously, and it would not have succeeded without building acceptance and overcoming resistance to change….”

Table 1: Cath Lab Performance Improvement Dashboard

Metric

Target

Baseline
Average

Baseline
Std.Dev.

Post-
Improvement
Average

Post-
Improvement
Std.Dev.

Change
Mean/-
Std.Dev.

Cases Start on Time

10 Mins.

22.1 Mins.

17.6 Mins.

10.2 Mins.

10.91 Mins.

++/++

In-Room Wait

5 Mins.

33.4 Mins.

17.6 Mins.

4.8 Mins.

10.2 Mins.

++/++

Room Turnaround Time

15 Mins.

51.28 Mins.

41.62 Mins.

19.96 Mins.

13.32 Mins.

++/++

MD Response to Page

10 Mins.

   

10.0 Mins.

8.8 Mins.

?

Key: ++Strong Improvement/Statistically Significant, + Improvement/Not Statistically Significant, – Negative Movement/Not Statistically Significant, — Strong Negative Movement/Statistically Significant.

The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is the leading healthcare system in western Pennsylvania and one of the largest nonprofit integrated healthcare systems in the United States. UPMC enjoys a strong national and international clinical and research reputation. It is the only academic medical center in the region, and with more than 35,000 employees, the system is the largest employer in western Pennsylvania. UPMC has been ranked among the “best of the best” in U.S. News & World Report’s hospital ranking for the past five years.

Register Now

  • Stop this in-your-face notice
  • Reserve your username
  • Follow people you like, learn from
  • Extend your profile
  • Gain reputation for your contributions
  • No annoying captchas across site
And much more! C'mon, register now.

Leave a Comment



Comments

Mark Graban 07-10-2013, 13:35

What does “they set a target of 10 minutes for cases to start on time” mean?

Does that mean a case would start, on average, 10 minutes late??

Reply

Login Form