SUNDAY, MAY 26, 2013
Font Size
Topic DPMO and Sigma Level

DPMO and Sigma Level

HomeForumsGeneral ForumsGeneralDPMO and Sigma Level

This topic has 4 voices, contains 12 replies, and was last updated by Avatar of Wynand Breytenbach Breytenbach 368 days ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
September 17, 2010 at 4:11 pm #168190
Avatar of Anupam Rohatgi
Rohatgi
Reputation - 2
Rank - Aluminum

Let us assume a PCB has 1000 solder points.
10000 such PCB makes it 1-million opportunites.

For 6-sigma process there would be 3.4 defects / million.
So if there are 3 solder defects in 10,000 PCB the process is 6-sigma.
But these 3-defects can happen in any PCB which means there is a possibility that there are 3-PCB found defective which translates to 3-defects per 10,000 PCB.

So, if we look at PCB level, the process is no longer at 6-Sigma Level.

What are your opinions ?

September 17, 2010 at 5:20 pm #168192
Avatar of Stan Mikel
Mikel
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

My opinion is this is a stupid question.

September 18, 2010 at 5:04 am #168197
Avatar of Anupam Rohatgi
Rohatgi
Reputation - 2
Rank - Aluminum

Questions are never Stupid.
Yes ! Answering can be in a Stupid ways

September 19, 2010 at 2:08 am #168202
Avatar of Don Strayer
Strayer
Reputation - 11
Rank - Aluminum

Not a stupid question! It depends on what you’re measuring. If you are measuring process sigma (DPMO where O is derived from the number of opportunities for defect to occur in each iteration of the process, e.g. 1000 solder points) your example would be a 6 sigma process. If you are measuring product sigma (DPMU where U is the number of output units) you find that it is not six sigma since you have a smaller denominator. If you are measuring defectives, you could have 1, 2, or 3 defectives per 10,000 units. All three defects could be an a single unit giving you just 1 defective, but still more than 3.4 defectives per million units.

DPMO is internal process focussed. What the customer really cares about is defectives. Accordingly I insist that defectives per million units is the most critical measure of quality. There are plenty of examples where the producer and the customer differ on meausurement of quality. The producer may be able to show that they have a six sigma process but the customer is seeing many more than 3.4 defectives per million units. Don’t argue with the customer.

September 19, 2010 at 4:54 am #168204
Avatar of Anupam Rohatgi
Rohatgi
Reputation - 2
Rank - Aluminum

Hi Straydog,

Thanks for your reply. It clarifies DPMO , DPMU but it raises one more question.
Customer is interested in DPMU which means Sigma Level should be measure at the Last Process Step.

Which makes it similar to RTY.
That means in a 10-Stage process each prior stage should be greater than 6-Sigma level.

End product to customer is combination of many set of products. e.g. TV+Remote.
So if TV & Remote assembly line produces 6-Sigma Level,
Then the final sigma level to customer would be ADDITIVE or MULTIPLICATIVE of both these Sigma levels

Awaiting you reply.

September 20, 2010 at 1:54 am #168207
Avatar of Stan Mikel
Mikel
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

There are lots of stupid questions, don’t let anyone kid you about that.

Your question and your further questions show a absolute lack of any research on your part. You just sit back and dream up crazy questions and instead of learning you throw them out like you deserve respect for lack of effort.

Go learn something and come back with rational questions.

September 21, 2010 at 3:25 am #168220
Avatar of Don Strayer
Strayer
Reputation - 11
Rank - Aluminum

There’s a reasonable assumption that reducing DPMO must also reduce DPMU. You may not be able to say whether it’s additive or multiplicative since mulitple defects may appear in a single unit (DPU). If you yave 3 delivered defects you could have anywhere from 1 to 3 defective units. If you really want to understand the 6s-DPMO metric, pick up Armand Feigenbaum’s book “Total Quality Contol”. For a criticism on whether it makes sense see Arthur M. Schneiderman’s posted article: http://www.schneiderman.com/The_Art_of_PM/six_sigma_metric/six_sigma_metric.htm
I emphasize customer focussed metrics. In the end, all internally focussed metrics are delusional if they differ from what the customer is seeing. From your original question I can guess that this is also your concern. Cheers.

September 21, 2010 at 3:51 am #168221
Avatar of Anupam Rohatgi
Rohatgi
Reputation - 2
Rank - Aluminum

Straydog,

Thanks ! You are right, we should look at it from customer point of view.
So focus on those process steps which leads to customer perceived defects

Anupam

September 21, 2010 at 3:56 pm #168224
Avatar of Stan Mikel
Mikel
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

Man you recommend boring reading.

Focusing solely on customer metrics is delusional. It is driving looking only at your rear view mirror. The data is slow and unreliable.

The reason for the internal focus is to have a more timely indicator. The things you see in your operation are the things your customer sees. You balance this by making sure that as you drive internal metrics the external metrics follow (but lag).

It’s QTC – Quality, time and cost.

Internal quality – DPMO
External quality – returns and complaints

Internal time – cycle time
External time – delivery complete to customer’s requested time

Cost is total cost – you have to comprehend the entire value chain

September 21, 2010 at 3:59 pm #168225
Avatar of Stan Mikel
Mikel
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

rabos,

You’ve got it all wrong. Focus is on steps that are value added to the customer, it has nothing to do with defects.

Your approach has people focusing on containment – the same stupid s**t people have been doing for 50 years.

September 22, 2010 at 11:24 pm #168235
Avatar of Don Strayer
Strayer
Reputation - 11
Rank - Aluminum

Stan, thanks for contributing your wisdom. I actually agree with you and I apologize to anyone else who may have thought I was recommending DPMU over DPMO. Complaints about delivered defects/defectives only tell us that something is wrong. The quandry in the original post was that there can be a disconnect between our internal quality metrics and what the customer sees — the point that Schneiderman makes and explains in his article. So let’s accept that 6s based on DPMO may not mean that the customer is seeing that level of quality and listen to VOC to tell us we still need to do better.

September 23, 2010 at 3:18 am #168236
Avatar of Stan Mikel
Mikel
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

I agree 100%

September 24, 2010 at 5:48 am #168240
Avatar of Wynand Breytenbach
Breytenbach
Reputation - 0
Rank - Aluminum

I’m a new subscriber to iSixSigma. Would like to read the original article. Where is this, and other articles, published?

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

Register Now

  • Stop this in-your-face notice
  • Reserve your username
  • Follow people you like, learn from
  • Extend your profile
  • Gain reputation for your contributions
  • No annoying captchas across site
And much more! C'mon, register now.

Reply To: DPMO and Sigma Level
Your information:






<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Practical Lean Six Sigma Problem Solving from Air Academy Associates
Lean and Six Sigma eLearning and Blended Solutions
Lean and Six Sigma Project Examples

Login Form