Anupam Rohatgi
September 17, 20100
Home › Forums › General Forums › General › DPMO and Sigma Level
This topic has 4 voices, contains 12 replies, and was last updated by
Breytenbach 368 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| September 17, 2010 at 4:11 pm #168190 | |
|
Rohatgi @rabaos Reputation - 2 Rank - Aluminum
|
Let us assume a PCB has 1000 solder points. For 6-sigma process there would be 3.4 defects / million. So, if we look at PCB level, the process is no longer at 6-Sigma Level. What are your opinions ? |
| September 17, 2010 at 5:20 pm #168192 | |
|
Mikel @Stan Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
My opinion is this is a stupid question. |
| September 18, 2010 at 5:04 am #168197 | |
|
Rohatgi @rabaos Reputation - 2 Rank - Aluminum
|
Questions are never Stupid. |
| September 19, 2010 at 2:08 am #168202 | |
|
Strayer @Straydog Reputation - 11 Rank - Aluminum
|
Not a stupid question! It depends on what you’re measuring. If you are measuring process sigma (DPMO where O is derived from the number of opportunities for defect to occur in each iteration of the process, e.g. 1000 solder points) your example would be a 6 sigma process. If you are measuring product sigma (DPMU where U is the number of output units) you find that it is not six sigma since you have a smaller denominator. If you are measuring defectives, you could have 1, 2, or 3 defectives per 10,000 units. All three defects could be an a single unit giving you just 1 defective, but still more than 3.4 defectives per million units. DPMO is internal process focussed. What the customer really cares about is defectives. Accordingly I insist that defectives per million units is the most critical measure of quality. There are plenty of examples where the producer and the customer differ on meausurement of quality. The producer may be able to show that they have a six sigma process but the customer is seeing many more than 3.4 defectives per million units. Don’t argue with the customer. |
| September 19, 2010 at 4:54 am #168204 | |
|
Rohatgi @rabaos Reputation - 2 Rank - Aluminum
|
Hi Straydog, Thanks for your reply. It clarifies DPMO , DPMU but it raises one more question. Which makes it similar to RTY. End product to customer is combination of many set of products. e.g. TV+Remote. Awaiting you reply. |
| September 20, 2010 at 1:54 am #168207 | |
|
Mikel @Stan Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
There are lots of stupid questions, don’t let anyone kid you about that. Your question and your further questions show a absolute lack of any research on your part. You just sit back and dream up crazy questions and instead of learning you throw them out like you deserve respect for lack of effort. Go learn something and come back with rational questions. |
| September 21, 2010 at 3:25 am #168220 | |
|
Strayer @Straydog Reputation - 11 Rank - Aluminum
|
There’s a reasonable assumption that reducing DPMO must also reduce DPMU. You may not be able to say whether it’s additive or multiplicative since mulitple defects may appear in a single unit (DPU). If you yave 3 delivered defects you could have anywhere from 1 to 3 defective units. If you really want to understand the 6s-DPMO metric, pick up Armand Feigenbaum’s book “Total Quality Contol”. For a criticism on whether it makes sense see Arthur M. Schneiderman’s posted article: http://www.schneiderman.com/The_Art_of_PM/six_sigma_metric/six_sigma_metric.htm |
| September 21, 2010 at 3:51 am #168221 | |
|
Rohatgi @rabaos Reputation - 2 Rank - Aluminum
|
Straydog, Thanks ! You are right, we should look at it from customer point of view. Anupam |
| September 21, 2010 at 3:56 pm #168224 | |
|
Mikel @Stan Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
Man you recommend boring reading. Focusing solely on customer metrics is delusional. It is driving looking only at your rear view mirror. The data is slow and unreliable. The reason for the internal focus is to have a more timely indicator. The things you see in your operation are the things your customer sees. You balance this by making sure that as you drive internal metrics the external metrics follow (but lag). It’s QTC – Quality, time and cost. Internal quality – DPMO Internal time – cycle time Cost is total cost – you have to comprehend the entire value chain |
| September 21, 2010 at 3:59 pm #168225 | |
|
Mikel @Stan Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
rabos, You’ve got it all wrong. Focus is on steps that are value added to the customer, it has nothing to do with defects. Your approach has people focusing on containment – the same stupid s**t people have been doing for 50 years. |
| September 22, 2010 at 11:24 pm #168235 | |
|
Strayer @Straydog Reputation - 11 Rank - Aluminum
|
Stan, thanks for contributing your wisdom. I actually agree with you and I apologize to anyone else who may have thought I was recommending DPMU over DPMO. Complaints about delivered defects/defectives only tell us that something is wrong. The quandry in the original post was that there can be a disconnect between our internal quality metrics and what the customer sees — the point that Schneiderman makes and explains in his article. So let’s accept that 6s based on DPMO may not mean that the customer is seeing that level of quality and listen to VOC to tell us we still need to do better. |
| September 23, 2010 at 3:18 am #168236 | |
|
Mikel @Stan Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
I agree 100% |
| September 24, 2010 at 5:48 am #168240 | |
|
Breytenbach @wynandpb Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum
|
I’m a new subscriber to iSixSigma. Would like to read the original article. Where is this, and other articles, published? |
© Copyright iSixSigma 2000-2013. User Agreement. Any reproduction or other use of content without the express written consent of iSixSigma is prohibited. More »