Jeff Barnhill
April 18, 20120
Home › Forums › General Forums › Training › MBB Feedback
This topic has 7 voices, contains 17 replies, and was last updated by
Mike Carnell 368 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| April 18, 2012 at 12:31 pm #180650 | |
|
Jeff Barnhill @EddieBarnhill Reputation - 62 Rank - Aluminum
|
Hi all, I am looking for feedback from my MBB peers. Since when did it become acceptable to say “I cannot answer that because I am not a statistician”. I hear this from individuals who teach other black belts on such things as 2-sample T tests, ANOVA and even on MSA variable study questions! What are your thoughts? P.S. I am asking this when I recently read a thread here where a simple question was asked about gage resolution and no one, not even proclaimed master black belts could answer (there sure were some nice fancy answers though!).
|
| April 18, 2012 at 5:05 pm #180658 | |
|
Chris Seider @cseider Reputation - 3020 Rank - Titanium
|
@EddieBarnhill My colleagues know I’m NOT a statistician but I have other talents and know how to use statistics and analysis to drive business results. If you ask me to derive the t curve, I’d have to say “Let me get back with you. :) ” What’s the real purpose behind the question of yours? Some of us either get too swamped to answer OR we know someone else will jump on the post or we just go “hmmmph” and ignore some things out there. Some of us even use this forum to keep in contact if on odd time zones. |
| April 18, 2012 at 7:27 pm #180676 | |
|
gomezadams @spazwhatsup Reputation - 89 Rank - Aluminum
|
Never be afraid to say I don’t know! ps I knew I needed an eye test,some of these random words confirm it? |
| April 20, 2012 at 6:02 am #180724 | |
|
Joel @joelatminitab Reputation - 974 Rank - Copper
|
@spazwhatsup I second your comments about the words at the bottom. These things are brutal and you can hardly ever ready them. Click on the speaker button for a real treat…I have no idea how what is spoken with gibberish in the background has anything to do with the words given. |
| April 23, 2012 at 1:05 pm #180809 | |
|
MBBinWI @MBBinWI Reputation - 2601 Rank - Titanium
|
@cseider – While I agree on the distribution of capabilities, I would expect that a “certification” would dictate a mean shift to a level where the minimum level is beyond the “I can’t answer because I’m not a statistician.” I’m not a statistician (as I’m sure Robert Butler can attest – a most learned statistician on this board), but I know enough to formulate a question and research a solution. Anything less would not delineate an MBB in my opinion. Now there are many instances where the answer is “it depends.” In fact, most questions that I receive must be prefaced with those two words – and until we establish the assumptions, anything else is a hope/prayer. @EddieBarnhill – I’m assuming that your comment was related to my post related to MSA and precision. Yes, I’m rather disappointed in the responses, particularly since it didn’t take a profound understanding of statistics, rather a fundamental understanding of basics. If you read my recent posting in that thread you will find a favorite question of mine which I use to separate those who have studied SS and those who understand SS. There is a difference. |
| May 1, 2012 at 2:07 pm #181006 | |
|
Chris Seider @cseider Reputation - 3020 Rank - Titanium
|
@MBBinWI I stand by someone’s past statement that I’d take a group of MBB’s, GB’s, or BB’s that could work with people and drive change with passion and energy than a group with mainly technical skills. However, so I’m clear…we need a MIX of skills for a group to work best–especially for a medium/larger organization that can have a group of MBB’s for leading the CI efforts. Oh, and I definitely need the RB’s, RK’s, and LK’s within an ear shot. OK, coffee break is over. |
| May 1, 2012 at 3:36 pm #181011 | |
|
Mike Carnell @Mike-Carnell Reputation - 3168 Rank - Titanium
|
@EddieBarnhill I am not sure how you have determined that people think it is acceptable to say that based on what? You have heard it how many times? I am not really sure how many times I would need to hear something before I decided it was now acceptable to say it. That comment wouldn’t fly in my company or the companies of most of the people I know. I have been in places where the culture drives that type of answer. In at least 2 organizations I am aware of there was an individual that tried to position himself as the approver of DOE’s before they were run. A second opinion is always a smart thing but I haven’t met the person with some kind of devine knowledge – although there are some that I do trust more than others. If this is a real issue for you why don’t you ask them why they said it? People do things for reasons and the simplest answer is to ask the people doing it. @MBBinWI and @cseider Absolutely agree with you on Robert Butler’s response. Let’s not forget a resource we all use on a pretty regular basis – the people at Minitab. Joel, who now is posting regularly – thank you, is a statistician and is very helpful. He replaced someone that is a statistician and was absolutely great, Jennifer Atlas. |
| May 1, 2012 at 9:58 pm #181020 | |
|
Chris Seider @cseider Reputation - 3020 Rank - Titanium
|
@Mike-Carnell |
| May 2, 2012 at 7:44 am #181025 | |
|
Jennifer Atlas @jennatlas Reputation - 539 Rank - Copper
|
@Mike-Carnell |
| May 2, 2012 at 9:05 am #181030 | |
|
MBBinWI @MBBinWI Reputation - 2601 Rank - Titanium
|
@jennatlas – can’t believe that your “reputation” score is only 73. Seems like @katiebarry should do something about that…
|
| May 2, 2012 at 10:14 am #181052 | |
|
Katie Barry @KatieBarry Reputation - 8008 Rank - Gold
|
Done :) |
| May 2, 2012 at 1:37 pm #181058 | |
|
Chris Seider @cseider Reputation - 3020 Rank - Titanium
|
@jennatlas |
| May 2, 2012 at 2:53 pm #181066 | |
|
Mike Carnell @Mike-Carnell Reputation - 3168 Rank - Titanium
|
@jennatlas I know they have not locked you away but we do miss your bright smiling face (we won’t mention bloodshot eyes) at the conferences. I do think that we have seriously neglected people understanding the difference the statistical software has made in our ability to roll out Six Sigma. Basically without it the whole concept of the way we roll it out would have to be different if we did not have the software to do the anaysis. Nobody except Gary Cone wants to do this on a 4 function calculator. Minitab jumped in to help us since the first wave of training in 1995 and has spent a lot of resources supporting the SS industry. We do appreciate the support and we appreciate the quality of the people Minitab has always kept on board to support all of us out here. Thanks. |
| May 2, 2012 at 7:19 pm #181077 | |
|
MBBinWI @MBBinWI Reputation - 2601 Rank - Titanium
|
@Mike-Carnell – hey, I was using Minitab back in 1981 and have the ref manual to prove it (and if I remember correctly, a B in the prob/stats class). |
| May 3, 2012 at 10:20 am #181093 | |
|
Mike Carnell @Mike-Carnell Reputation - 3168 Rank - Titanium
|
@MBBinWI I didn’t see Minitab until 1990 at Motorola Seguin Texas. We had been using Statgrafics up until them and always had management on our butts because of the way the graphs looked. Don’t remember my stats grade. I do remember talking to the professor about it. I told him I liked it and asked what I could do with stats. His enlightened advice “nothing.” I guess that is why he was teaching stats at night. I considered looking him up but what is the point? |
| May 3, 2012 at 1:02 pm #181108 | |
|
MBBinWI @MBBinWI Reputation - 2601 Rank - Titanium
|
@Mike-Carnell – my perpetual lament about engineering curricula is that they do not integrate variability into the design courses. Everything is book equations with “thumb rule” safety factors. I’ve tried several times to convince my alma mater to let me propose a DfSS course. In fact, one of my classmates is the current dpt head for civil and mech eng dpt and I can’t get him to bring me in for a proposal. They have a 6 week (18 hours) GB track in the eng mgmt course. You’d think that with the military embracing LSS, and the criticality of logistics and acquisition, there’d be more of an interest. Funniest thing about Minitab in the olden days was that we ran it on punch cards. And you didn’t want to drop that stack or you were toast. In order not to use up punches on the card with an index number, they were printed with the index number. If you dropped them, you had to resort by looking at this probably 6 point font number. @joelatminitab – that was probably before you were even born, wasn’t it!?! |
| May 3, 2012 at 1:41 pm #181112 | |
|
Chris Seider @cseider Reputation - 3020 Rank - Titanium
|
@MBBinWI |
| May 3, 2012 at 3:50 pm #181125 | |
|
Mike Carnell @Mike-Carnell Reputation - 3168 Rank - Titanium
|
@MBBinWI We did the punch card stuff too. We had SAS and SPSS. |
© Copyright iSixSigma 2000-2013. User Agreement. Any reproduction or other use of content without the express written consent of iSixSigma is prohibited. More »