iSixSigma

Maciek

Forum Replies Created

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #170926

    Maciek
    Participant

    George,
    I’m located in Poland. I will respect of copyright of course. I will give you my feedback about it later. Thank in advance.
    Regards
    Maciej
    [email protected]

    0
    #170918

    Maciek
    Participant

    George,
    Could you be so kind and send a copy of this kaizen slides to me. Thank you in andvance for your help.
    maciej
    [email protected]

    0
    #170917

    Maciek
    Participant

    George,
    Could you be so kind and send a copy of kaizen slides to me? I’m working on the some improvement and kaizen slides will be very helpful for me. Thank in advance for your help.
    maciej.
    [email protected]

    0
    #170834

    Maciek
    Participant

    Could you be so kind and send a copy ot this slides me? Thanks in advance.
    [email protected]

    0
    #155181

    Maciek
    Participant

    I’m intrested in this matter. Could you be so kind and send mi more information for my email. Thanks a lot. [email protected]

    0
    #155182

    Maciek
    Participant

    Could you send me too. [email protected]

    0
    #154285

    Maciek
    Participant

    Hi all. Could you send mi a copy of this video?
    Thanks in [email protected]

    0
    #154024

    Maciek
    Participant

    You can’t use historical mean because during transformation Box-Cox your data are modified by mathematical transformation. During Box-Cox tranformation you need to transform your USL and LSL as well. I hope its helps..

    0
    #154019

    Maciek
    Participant

    I was trying to send e-mail for your adress but without success. :( Could you be so kind and send mi video. Thanks a lot.maciej(dot)kowalski(at)mikrostyk(dot)pl

    0
    #154013

    Maciek
    Participant

    Could you be so kind and send me a copy of this video to me, as well. Thanks very [email protected]

    0
    #153814

    Maciek
    Participant

    Jim,
    Could you send me the same.Thanks a lot.
    [email protected]

    0
    #153476

    Maciek
    Participant

    Jim
    I’m afraid that we don’t understand ourselves. There is a individual distribution identification in Minitab menu (stat/quality tools/individual …). After this options we received different distribution for checking our data and their distribution. Can you give me your email- I will send you my project – our discussion will be easier then. Thanks a lot.

    0
    #153475

    Maciek
    Participant

    Jim
    I’m afraid that we don’t understand ourselves. There is a individual distribution identification in Minitab menu (stat/quality tools/individual …). After this options we received different distribution for checking our data and their distribution. Can you give me your email- I will send you my project – our discussion will be easier then. Thanks a lot.

    0
    #153471

    Maciek
    Participant

    Hans,
    I’m reading your discussion. I’m very intresting in Kanban. Could you be so kind and send me this game too. :) my email: [email protected] a lot. :)

    0
    #153470

    Maciek
    Participant

    Yes, I have tried individual distribution identification. I’ve received strange result. The strange situation is that two from three normality test showed p-value above 0,05 and one below 0,05. I would like to change the normality test in capability sixpack in Minitab. Is there any option to change that? I would like prepare normality test with aid of Ryan-Joiner or Kolmogorov-Smirnov instead of Anderson-Darling test ? Is it possible to change it in Minitab? I can send you my data in email.

    0
    #145160

    Maciek
    Participant

    I agree with Daves. There is no possibility to get Cpk =0,8 with 100% conforming and Cpk=2 with 100% nonconforming. These indicators are depends on specification limits, so situation describd above is impossible (in my opinion).

    0
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)