Orang_Utan

I agree with you is the quality service in your university is in doubt judging from your English writing standard.
This word “fenomenal” is only understood by people in your university who claim the standard of “matrikulasi” is same as STPM.

Why don’t you spend more resources on new product planning instead of waiting your customers tell you all sorts of unhappiness. May be you are looking for another six sigma project?

I thought promotion for website is not allowed in this forum.

Six Sigma is not about statistics theory.

Effect in C&M is your process outputs.

I see management is too greedy to chase after many unplanned goals without considering TOC on their people.

Too many cooks spoil the soup. Too many tools spoil the success.A company I know is running three types of CI i.e. six sigma, TPM and task force (kaizen) under different departments by a same group of people simultaneously.The end result is their resources are spread out too thin and CIs are out of focus.

This is only six sigma royalty free ebook I found in the internet. The ebook is a publication from Asian Productivity Organization for educational use only.

There are IT people were using Taguchi DOE to find KPIVs and reduce 100% code testing to just 20 %.

I was bit late compared with you. I remember almost no wafer fabs exist in Asia outside Japan in 70s.

Honda calls their CI as TQC, same as Fujifilm.

Many forum softwares can keep a backup copy in your PC in case there is server communication problem with your PC.Copy and paste is not a six sigma solution for we users. iSxisigma.com shall improve the software if they preach six sigma concept. :-(

I assume you refer to this
http://www.advanced-projects.com/APICS_study.htmThe authors of “Continuous Improvement Trio: ….” did not infer 20 times and 10 times kinda nonsense stuff. I can come out another simpleton’s conclusion also, TOC stand-alone is contributing nothing (0%) without both lean and six sigma tools. :-)In mathematic wise, using…[Read more]

Andy, I have no objection to any name people wanted to call their system. :-)The fact presented in a million readerships newspapers must be correct and not bias.Are you in celebration mode? We are off for the next week for two major festivals.

For me TOC is a commonsense bottleneck concept.

Simon Wong?,I seocnd you, LSS is a three letters word, leaner than four letters word, lean. LOL

The authors of this research paper have not gut to come down on this kind of simpleton’s conclusion.Besides the mathematic error pointed by you. Its linearity assumption still needed to be validated.The savings due to lean and six sigma in 6 plants applied TOC, Lean and Six Sigma not necessary same as standalone lean or six sigma in other plants.…[Read more]

Sorry, my mistake. The authors of this research paper did not draw 20 and 10 times more effective kind of conclusion.

http://www.scientificbusinesssolutions.com/page6.htmlThe conclusion drawn in above article written by two PhD holders is a full of fallacy.If you read and scrutinize the orginal text, the article does not say TOC is applied standalone. Lean and Six Sigma are applied subsequently after TOC analysis.The correct conclusion as per their research data…[Read more]