• My papers below expose the farce of the 1.5 sigma drift/shift/correction/dynamic mean offset, that forms the six sigma of Six Sigma Stupidity.…[Read more]

  • Yeh “force” of blatant stupidity.
    From its laughable foundations, every aspect of Six Sigma Stupidity is a bad joke … except of course, what psychologist, Harry called its “80% TQM”. 2 years, 10 months ago

  • I suggest that you do NOT teach the Six Sigma farce. 2 years, 10 months ago

  • tbs11,

    Mike is ranting about the 1.5 sigma shift that forms the “six sigma” of Six Sigma. It is utter nonsense. Six Sigma is a farce.

    Cp is a poor attempt to replace a control chart with a number.

    Focus on using a control chart to keep your process ‘on target with minimum variance’. This is the definition of World Class Quality.

    A…[Read more]

  • It is hard to believe that companies are fighting over certification for a blatant farce as Six Sigma.

    Six Sigma is a management fad based on utter nonsense. It was created by a psychologist who claimed that all processes shift or drift by +/-1.5 sigma in 24 hours and this claim was based on the height of a stack of discs. (Benderizing) It went…[Read more]

  • Mike,
    Isn’t everyone “scamming certification” as you suggest? We all know that Six Sigma is based on utter nonsense.

    [Links to poster’s own articles found elsewhere removed per Forum guidelines]
    3 years, 4 months ago

  • Why do you want to know the distribution for your process? Control charts work with any distribution, without normalization. They can also be used for short runs such as yours. I suggest buying “Short Run SPC” – Dr Wheeler. 3 years, 4 months ago

  • Cp/Cpk is an attempt to replace a control chart with a number. It is a statistic that changes over time. 3 years, 4 months ago

  • Burns became a registered member 3 years, 4 months ago