Fausto Galetto

@Daniel.S 

Continuous Improvement Engineer AND

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt

SHOULD WANT that MINITAB IMPROVE their ERRORS!!!

WHY do you do not ask them to do that????????????????

• I Don’t have anything better to do—————

@David007

You say:

“””Fausto’s students search in vain for an assignable cause but there are none to be found because the process is inherently exponential.”””

PROVE that if the data are “””inherently exponential””” there are NO Assignable causes!!!

YOU forgot that T CHARTS Control Limits are WRONG in Minitab!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Read more]

Are you all very happy of this big drawback of MINITAB?

@ STATISTICIANS

“This Fausto guy…” read several papers in the References of the VERY VERY INTERESTING paper

Control Charts Based on the Exponential Distribution: Adapting Runs Rules for the t Chart

Eduardo Santiago a & Joel Smith,  Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania

In Quality Engineering     http://w…[Read more]

@PlsKISS

You wrote: Statisticians use the terms “degrees of freedom” to describe the number of values in the final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary.

This is explanation is due to (whom I call) “normal drugged statisticians” (they are the people that have their “statistical” knowledge based on the Normal Distributed data).

I r…[Read more]

@KatieBarry

I was challenged to write a paper and to have it PEER REVIEWED, BECAUSE the “discussants in the post” did not have enough knowledge of any method for dealing “correctly” with T Charts.

THEY did not believe that I am right…

THEY think that only PEER REVIEWED papers are good!

It false!

I suggested my documents in order to GIVE THEM…[Read more]

I am very sorry for you.

Good learning is forbidden to you: when I cite some of my papers they are cancelled …

On the contrary, wrong papers are allowed:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08982112.2012.740646

Did you find the errors in that PEER REVIEWED paper?

Signature: “This Fausto guy …… whack job”

“This Fausto guy…”

thinks that Darth is very democratic!!! ???

Deming’s ideas are in order [Deming (1986)]

·         “It is a hazard to copy”,

·         “It is necessary to understand the theory of what one wishes to do or to make.”

·         “The result is that hundreds of people are learning what is wrong. I make this statement on the basis…[Read more]

In these days, I read several papers about “””Charts with exponential distributed data”””: full IGNORANCE!!!

IF YOU WANT….

you can find some hints in my paper

[EDITED BY MODERATOR]

VERY VERY INTERESTING

Quality Engineering

Control Charts Based on the Exponential Distribution: Adapting Runs Rules for the t Chart

Eduardo Santiago a & Joel Smith,  Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania

VERY VERY GOOD paper… PEER REVIEWED by … INCOMPETENT …

• I will send my “rebuttal paper” to Quality Engineering.

[Read more]

@rbutler

The paper suggestedd by David007 proves that Peer Review Process does not assure “quality (????)” of the papers………………

See the file

@David007

As I said in a previous post (I do not remember “when”) THAT’S WRONG!!!!

THEORY is needed!!!!

Another case of WRONG T Chart and WRONG decisions ….

• in the VERY; VERY GOOD paper!?!?!?!? [as someone said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

AFTER several e-mails exchanged with MINITAB, here are the conclusions:

From MINITAB:

1.    Discussing the topic of the theory behind the T charts are not covered by our free technical support,

2.    and I would refer you to consult with your favorite statistician

3.    or you can pay us for tutoring through our Statistical Consultin…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS

I will write a Green&White&Red paper and I send it to a Statistics Journal HOPING that ti will be analysed by INTELLIGENT Peer Reviewers……….

The Correct THEORY is in my books.

I am not allowed by iSixSigma to provide links to my documents!!!

For the time being let you be informed that I informed MINITAB of their T Chart…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS who use

<<<< Six Sigma is 34 years old and yet continues to be used with success.>>>

With EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION AND millions of simulations one can find that the MINITAB T CHARTS are WRONG 93.3% of “applications”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DAVID007 (BOND, David Bond?)

NOW do you not believe in SIM…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS

Incompetent “””experts””” DO NOT believe in THEORY

Incompetent “””experts””” BELIEVE in SIMULATIONS

With millions of simulations one can find that the MINITAB T CHARTS are WRONG 93.3% of “applications”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!