Fausto Galetto

Are you all very happy of this big drawback of MINITAB?

@ STATISTICIANS

“This Fausto guy…” read several papers in the References of the VERY VERY INTERESTING paper

Control Charts Based on the Exponential Distribution: Adapting Runs Rules for the t Chart

Eduardo Santiago a & Joel Smith,  Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania

In Quality Engineering     http://w…[Read more]

@PlsKISS

You wrote: Statisticians use the terms “degrees of freedom” to describe the number of values in the final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary.

This is explanation is due to (whom I call) “normal drugged statisticians” (they are the people that have their “statistical” knowledge based on the Normal Distributed data).

I r…[Read more]

@KatieBarry

I was challenged to write a paper and to have it PEER REVIEWED, BECAUSE the “discussants in the post” did not have enough knowledge of any method for dealing “correctly” with T Charts.

THEY did not believe that I am right…

THEY think that only PEER REVIEWED papers are good!

It false!

I suggested my documents in order to GIVE THEM…[Read more]

I am very sorry for you.

Good learning is forbidden to you: when I cite some of my papers they are cancelled …

On the contrary, wrong papers are allowed:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08982112.2012.740646

Did you find the errors in that PEER REVIEWED paper?

Signature: “This Fausto guy …… whack job”

“This Fausto guy…”

thinks that Darth is very democratic!!! ???

Deming’s ideas are in order [Deming (1986)]

·         “It is a hazard to copy”,

·         “It is necessary to understand the theory of what one wishes to do or to make.”

·         “The result is that hundreds of people are learning what is wrong. I make this statement on the basis…[Read more]

In these days, I read several papers about “””Charts with exponential distributed data”””: full IGNORANCE!!!

IF YOU WANT….

you can find some hints in my paper

[EDITED BY MODERATOR]

VERY VERY INTERESTING

Quality Engineering

Control Charts Based on the Exponential Distribution: Adapting Runs Rules for the t Chart

Eduardo Santiago a & Joel Smith,  Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania

VERY VERY GOOD paper… PEER REVIEWED by … INCOMPETENT …

• I will send my “rebuttal paper” to Quality Engineering.

[Read more]

@rbutler

The paper suggestedd by David007 proves that Peer Review Process does not assure “quality (????)” of the papers………………

See the file

@David007

As I said in a previous post (I do not remember “when”) THAT’S WRONG!!!!

THEORY is needed!!!!

Another case of WRONG T Chart and WRONG decisions ….

• in the VERY; VERY GOOD paper!?!?!?!? [as someone said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

AFTER several e-mails exchanged with MINITAB, here are the conclusions:

From MINITAB:

1.    Discussing the topic of the theory behind the T charts are not covered by our free technical support,

2.    and I would refer you to consult with your favorite statistician

3.    or you can pay us for tutoring through our Statistical Consultin…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS

I will write a Green&White&Red paper and I send it to a Statistics Journal HOPING that ti will be analysed by INTELLIGENT Peer Reviewers……….

The Correct THEORY is in my books.

I am not allowed by iSixSigma to provide links to my documents!!!

For the time being let you be informed that I informed MINITAB of their T Chart…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS who use

<<<< Six Sigma is 34 years old and yet continues to be used with success.>>>

With EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION AND millions of simulations one can find that the MINITAB T CHARTS are WRONG 93.3% of “applications”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DAVID007 (BOND, David Bond?)

NOW do you not believe in SIM…[Read more]

@ All STATISTICIANS

Incompetent “””experts””” DO NOT believe in THEORY

Incompetent “””experts””” BELIEVE in SIMULATIONS

With millions of simulations one can find that the MINITAB T CHARTS are WRONG 93.3% of “applications”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!