Control Limits too Narrow
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Control Limits too Narrow
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 8 months ago by
chhabra.
- AuthorPosts
- June 11, 2008 at 11:53 am #50264
I am doing a P-chart but getting control limits that are too narrow….all the data points are out of control. The avg p is 0.06019, UCL is 0.06073, LCL is 0.50965.
What’s going wrong ? My sample size per day is high…actually 6,00,000 to 9,00,000. Is that the reason ? What shd be the right approach to solve this riddle and come to reasonable decisions ?
0June 11, 2008 at 12:51 pm #172737Amit,
Please repost with clarified numbers.
I think you mean LCL = 0.050965 not 0.50965. What is the sample size used to calculate these limits? I’m not familiar with a convention where we have significant digit comma two more digits comma three more digits? Is it six hundred thousand? Six million? Sixty thousand?
Your calculations of the control limits are wrong, regardless. How are you doing them?
Your UCL and LCL are not symmetric around the average if the LCL is taken as 0.050965.
.0June 11, 2008 at 1:38 pm #172740
luke skywalkerParticipant@luke-skywalkerInclude @luke-skywalker in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Yes, your sample size is several order of magnitude too high for a p-chart. It can adequately handle samples around 500 but fades as the sample sizes increase from there.
There is a set of test criteria to assess this: np>5 AND n(1-p)>5
If you satisfy both of those, the stats books suggets that your binomial data approximates the normal enough for you to use an I-mR chart. The observations plotted there would be th eindividual sample proportions.
Cheers!0June 11, 2008 at 5:21 pm #172746Thanks Luke. The I-chart looks good.
0 - AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.