Diamond polishing
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Diamond polishing
- This topic has 12 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
mzs.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2005 at 3:16 pm #39411
Hi,
Anyone there to help me out?
Thanks,
How to imlement six sigma where the manufacturing process is non standard(not measurruble)0May 19, 2005 at 3:25 pm #119738
Titu JohnMember@Titu-JohnInclude @Titu-John in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Hi,
I do understand the nature of your industry its basically a manual job or an art . You must understand the fundamental saying that “Thing which cannot be measured ,can’t be improved “. so without measures you cannot use any statistical tools.
Regards,
Titu0May 19, 2005 at 3:26 pm #119739
Raju,
If it’s not measurable, how do you know if it’s working? What’s good and what’s bad? And if you can’t measure it, how will you know when you’ve improved it? Can you give more specifics?0May 19, 2005 at 4:25 pm #119752I’m not sure how you say diamond polishing is non-measurable.
What is the margin on princess vs. SRB cuts?
How well does final polished valuation meet with incoming quality of rough from different suppliers?
What is the angle between the [111] cleavage planes and the final polished faces?
Is the throughput of the polishers constrained by the throughput of the cutters?
What is the spread of the meet points of the polished product?
I assume you are mostly dealing with Argyle rough?
BTDT0May 19, 2005 at 4:47 pm #119755
Mike CarnellParticipant@Mike-CarnellInclude @Mike-Carnell in your post and this person will
be notified via email.BTDT,
Someone walked right into your area of expertise!
Regards0May 19, 2005 at 4:49 pm #119756
Mike CarnellParticipant@Mike-CarnellInclude @Mike-Carnell in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Raju,
Since polishing can’t be measured why don’t you save money and stop polishing them? An unpolished one looks the same as a polished one, right?0May 19, 2005 at 6:22 pm #119759Raju:The simplest project I can think of would be based on weight retention from rough. The financial benefits are easy to calculate and the potential influencing factors could come from technical issues to work scope definition and training.
Too much variation during polishing will result in low quality polished. The relationship between the largest size with the best cut can be modelled using existing standards for the GIA or AGS, and combining those with market prices for loose stones. Our analysis showed Table, Polish and Symmetry as contributing equally to the price of the final polished stones. The error in the model was 1.31% for SRB. We did not include the smaller, single cut stones you may be working with.
Get yourself a Sarin machine for facet measurement and incorporate periodic measurements as part of your Control plan.
BTDT0May 20, 2005 at 2:14 am #119783Mike:Diamond in the rough :)BTDT
0May 25, 2005 at 4:25 pm #120158Hai and thnks everyone responded to my topic.
I am still not sure how to implement 6 sigma in this industry.
A breif to who new to diamond industry,We are working with 3 to 6mm diameter diamonds.the accuracy needed in microns and while polishing on the machines it is difficult to check the angle and size.
0May 25, 2005 at 4:32 pm #120159hai BTDT
The sarine machine is an excellent tool to meassure but the limitation is it is done only after an operation ,as you know it is very difficult to repair a diamond.If we get the job done @ first time we are also saving the yield.
Thanking you for your interest and valueable suggetion
regards raju0May 25, 2005 at 4:43 pm #120163Raju:My point was NOT that you have a monitoring program while the diamonds are on the dop chuck. You apply Six Sigma to the entire process of polishing. This includes the accuracy of the dial stop gauges, grinding/checking time intervals, pressure, lap speed, different index wheels, etc.
Checking angles and meet points on the final stones is done after they are removed from the chuck. This data is used to identify to sources of variation in the final product.
The amount of repair will decrease. This is related to the first-time-yield, also covered in a Six Sigma project.
Whether you can get accurate measurements on 3-6mm stones will be part of a Gauge R&R study for any project directed at measuring the quality of the polish.
BTDT0May 25, 2005 at 5:22 pm #120175Raju,
Are you serious … microns … surely you mean nanometers? Don’t get me wrong … I’ve never worked with diamonds, or even diamond substrates, only optics – lenses and mirrors. In optics any variation of form by as much as a micron would be immediately noticeable.
Regards,
Andy0June 26, 2005 at 1:58 pm #122179Raju,
While BTDT’s idea of tracking weight retention is a good basis he is incorrect about table, polish & symmetry. Beyond color & clarity today’s quality criteria is based on light return (brilliance). The range of acceptable critical angles in the pavilion, in conjunction with the corresponding crown angles then table size and finally polish & symmetry result in the true cut grade.
He is also correct about using a Sarin, it’s th only way you can plan or measure your results.
mzs0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.