Difficulty with Destructive Testing
February 18, 2020 at 5:10 pm #246216
nucappyParticipant@nucappy Include @nucappy in your post and this person will
be notified via email.
I’m having some trouble trying to do data analysis leveraging between two destructive tests on the same product.
Background: I have variable data from 500 samples out of a population of 40,000 from a destructive test that ends up in a non-normal distribution. I need to perform a second destructive test that is pass/fail, but I want to be able to prove that the samples being tested in the second test contain a non-zero amount of samples at the bottom 5% of the range observed in the first test. Due to the destructive nature of both tests, is there a way to make an argument that sample size “x” is large enough for the second test to ensure the amount of bottom 5% of samples I need is included in that population?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.