Distribution for time.
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Distribution for time.
- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
Theo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2007 at 12:49 pm #45866
Peter ÖrtlundParticipant@Peter-ÖrtlundInclude @Peter-Örtlund in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Hello everyone.
Does anyone have a guideline or at least an opinion what distribution is the most appropriate for the variable time? (Foremost thinking about lead-time)0January 18, 2007 at 6:54 pm #150750Peter,
As a general rule time studies are not normally distributed. If you are familiar with Minitab you can do a best fit test. Many times, at least in my experience, my time data (repair times) does not fit a set distrbution, so I have to transform my data. Doing this in Minitab.
So to answer your question time data does not fit a specified data distribution. You simply have to find the best distribution match.
0January 18, 2007 at 7:51 pm #150756Peter:Cycle time and time-between occurances tend to follow well understood distributions. Look into Weibull and exponential respectively.Cheers, BTDT
0January 18, 2007 at 8:28 pm #150761Weibull is most likely the distribution for time.
0January 18, 2007 at 8:43 pm #150762Time based processes are usually strongly skewed and commonly bimodal.
Attempts to fit distributions is one of six sigma’s many fallacies. There is no need to attempt to fit distributions to such data, in a process improvement context.
Learn to understand what the data in the histogram is telling you.
You can find a useful exercise here:
http://www.q-skills.com/nm/nm.htm0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.