DMAIC in automated environment
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › DMAIC in automated environment
- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
Nina.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 30, 2008 at 6:18 am #50643
Hi. Can DMAIC be readily applied to highly automated environments ? Or is it more suitable where manual work processes, handoffs etc are involved.
0July 30, 2008 at 6:41 am #174354
Michael MeadParticipant@Michael-MeadInclude @Michael-Mead in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Hello Nina..
You can use DMAIC anywhere there is an opportunity for improvement. If that eliminates your automated process, somebody is not thinking very deeply. Without trying to be tough on you, why would you think DMAIC could not be used?
Good luck.0July 30, 2008 at 9:16 am #174355Because making process improvement inside the IT Black Box is a different ball-game compared to manual processes that are more visible and prone to variation.
0July 30, 2008 at 11:57 am #174357Nina,
DMAIC is a methodology used for problem solving.. The toolkit might change when working in the software world but the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve , Control is still very valid.
You can find many article on Six Sigma for Software Generation and DFSS software generation.
You were correct in the assumption that dealing with IT issues is different that tactile issues but only the toolkit changes.
0July 30, 2008 at 4:02 pm #174364
Robert KluttzMember@Robert-KluttzInclude @Robert-Kluttz in your post and this person will
be notified via email.DMAIC can be applied in a highly automated environment. However, some of the tools that you may need are non-traditional to Six Sigma.
I would start out any automation DMAIC process by doing a pre-measure phase – validating the repeatability, accuracy and reproduceability of all measurement systems. What I’ve tended to see in many manufacturing environments is that the measurement systems (scales, feeders, weigh belts, thermocouples, etc) arent always installed correctly, maintained properly or scaled according to the range of operation. I would bet that you’d be able to make substantial improvements just by identifying measurement issues. I’d also take a long hard look at your data collection system. Is your data historian sampling fast enough? Do you have the capability to extract a years worth of data?
From there I’d go straight into define. It’ll be important that you scope correctly. Will IT infrascructure be within project scope? Whats your estimated saving? Do you have industry benchmarks available to establish entitlement? These are the questions you need to be asking.
Your analyze and improve phases may be slightly different depending on the volume of data you’re collecting. Fast Fourier Transform analysis may be more beneficial than a traditional DOE or multi-vari studies.
In short – yes, you can use DMAIC in a highly automated process.
0July 30, 2008 at 4:14 pm #174370
Mike CarnellParticipant@Mike-CarnellInclude @Mike-Carnell in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Nina,
The automated environment is an interesting world. Your controllers can be a huge cause of variation depending on how they are programed but that does not make the projects IT projects. Most good automation people are very good at delivering exactly what you ask for assuming you know what to ask for. Once they run correctly the great part is that Control is simple. It is done by definition.
The tool sets and the order of execution doesn’t have to change at all.
If you email me at [email protected] I can give you hook you up with a guy who has set up several operations.
Good luck.0July 31, 2008 at 9:31 am #174406Thanks for all the help and insights. But I am still struggling to translate the ramifications in a automated services environment where we talk of “straight through processing”s and workflow systems. Any guidance or references will be most welcome.
0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.