Forcast to Actual Analysis for Means / Hypothesis
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › Finance › Forcast to Actual Analysis for Means / Hypothesis
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
Adam Bowden.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:31 pm #24704
Black Belt guyParticipant@Black-Belt-guyInclude @Black-Belt-guy in your post and this person will
be notified via email.An MBB told me that when conducting hypothesis testing of means on financial projects such as forcast to actual that all of the data points should be transformed to absolute values. Does anyone know why this would be done?
0November 28, 2007 at 3:38 pm #59221
Adam BowdenParticipant@Adam-BowdenInclude @Adam-Bowden in your post and this person will
be notified via email.The MBB s probably wanting you to use a Chi Sq table rather than
another method.If you look at forecasting the business does not want to hear about
P values as they don’t understand them. It may be worth
transforming the language into one that they understand like %
accuracy by month, quarter, year etc and keep the stat stuff in your
pocket. At the end of the day so what if you detect a statistically significant
difference in means – what are you going to do next ? You need to
identify key drivers like market, product, seasonality, sales forecast
accuracy, finance cut off rules, Marketing promotions etc etc.Good luck.Adam0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Finance’ is closed to new topics and replies.