iSixSigma

Gage RR CPK

Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Gage RR CPK

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 10, 2006 at 9:14 pm #43043

    batman
    ★ 10 Years ★
    Participant

    The team is trying to justify a new gage system. Our current system has %study variation of 20. The new gage system has %study variation of 10. How does an improved Gage RR correlate to an improved cpk index?
    We are trying to justify the cost of the new style gage. If there is another way to do this we would like to know as well.

    0
    April 11, 2006 at 3:02 am #136222

    Chicagoan
    ★ 10 Years ★
    Participant

    Batman,
    Following is the relationship between Cp and GRR:
    Cp(Actual) = Cp(Measured)/sqrt(1-GRR^2). If there is no significant mean shift in your process, the above formula holds true for Cpk’s as well.
    Cp(Actual) = True process potential (cannot be directly measured as the it is being effected by the measurement device that is being utilized)
    Cp(Measured) = Measured process potential with the gage
    Hope this helps.
     

    0
    April 11, 2006 at 3:32 pm #136246

    batman
    ★ 10 Years ★
    Participant

    Ok a little more help, what number from the GRR do we use in the formula? 
    %Contribution = 1.12
    %Study Var  =10.6
    or something else? When we tried the formula the CP was better than expected. Here is what we used
    Cp(Actual) = Cp(Measured)/sqrt(1-GRR^2)
    Cp (actual)= 1.33/sqrt(1-(0.106^2))

    0
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.