- September 30, 2002 at 7:03 pm #30452
John BabinaParticipant@John-Babina Include @John-Babina in your post and this person will
be notified via email.
In the Glossary . . . .The definitions for Alpha risk, Beta risk, Type I error, Type II error and the assignment of Producers Risk to Type I and Consumers Risk to Type II all seem correct.
However the actual definition of Consumers and Producters Risk under those specific titles seems to be reversed. I believe that Producers Risk is rejecting good parts as bad and Consumers Risk is shipping bad parts as if they were good.
I know this can be tricky, can someone confirm my concern?0September 30, 2002 at 7:28 pm #79333
That act of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true is a Type I error.
Failing to to reject the null hypothesis when it is false is a Type II error.
Keepinh these consistant I would say the the producers risk is rejecting when it is good. Consumer risk shipping bad parts.
So it seems you are correct. Please change the glossary as required.0
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.