Since you haven’t provided any info regarding %Contribution the P-value itself may be strong but that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to react on it.
By the Degrees of Freedom and MS-values I made a quick calculation and came up with the conclusion that the %Part was approx 0,903 meaning your measurement equipment (including interaction) is less than 10%. This is just about accepted unless you have seen some trouble with it.
To deal with interaction it all comes down to why part(s) is behaving differently when measured with a specific instrument (device). You have to find the part, and the device, that contributed to the high interaction value. Then examine all factors that distinguish the part/device from the others, and hopefully you find the answers to the odd behaviour.
What part and device that you’re looking for could be seen in MINITAB’s GageR&R interaction graph (bottom, right hand graph; in ver 14).
“To solely react on P-values is like putting up the umbrella when a rain drop falls on your head, but the sky’s almost blue.”
The drop is real, true (that’s what the P-value says).But there’s no rain as far as the eye can see; that’s what the %Contribution says.So, no umbrella (no reaction).
I know, a lousy analogy, but I want you to look further than just a few inches, which I think you may do when looking at single parameters.
P3
.
