Minitab control charts: test 2 question
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Minitab control charts: test 2 question
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
Heebeegeebee BB.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 17, 2008 at 8:17 am #49876
Rob ThompsonMember@Rob-ThompsonInclude @Rob-Thompson in your post and this person will
be notified via email.When plotting control charts in Minitab, Test 2 = 9 points in a row on same side of center line.If these points are BELOW the centre line, then it potentially indicates a process improvement.If these points are ABOVE the centre line, then it potentially indicates a process improvement.My question is why?
0April 17, 2008 at 8:23 am #171262
Rob ThompsonMember@Rob-ThompsonInclude @Rob-Thompson in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Sorry – ignore the above, my message should have read:When plotting control charts in Minitab, Test 2 = 9 points in a row on same side of center line.If these points are BELOW the centre line, then it potentially indicates a process improvement.If these points are ABOVE the centre line, then it potentially indicates a process DEGRADATION.My question is why?
0April 17, 2008 at 2:19 pm #171275Rob,
“When plotting control charts in Minitab, Test 2 = 9 points in a row on same side of center line.”
This is the only part of your post that is strictly true.
The presence of this pattern suggests that there is sufficient evidence of a special cause to warrant investigation. That is; it is economic when the signal appears to try and find out why. That is the meaning of all the tests.
So, if you can fnd the special cause and institute it into the process, than an improvement might be possible.
The part about above the center line and below is situational. What if above the center line is in the direction of defective parts? Larger is not always better.
The presence of any signal on test 2 will indicate a process improvement possibility. If in the direction of goodness, institutionalize it in the process. If it is in the direction of badness, find a way to prevent it ever happening again.0April 17, 2008 at 2:54 pm #171277
HeartlandParticipant@HeartlandInclude @Heartland in your post and this person will
be notified via email.In a control chart up or down are both bad in most cases. (yes, I know some things 0 is best and lower would be better, and others most is best example for low might be time to fill an order, or most might be good product produced per hour). Even in those limited cases you need to be careful. For example: if you decrease time to fill an order at a pick/pack operation without looking at the entire system you could cause stock outs because your KANBAN was established at the old speed (next step adjust the KANBAN).
The center, or target, is named target for a reason. 9 in a row indicate something has changed and should be investigated. If the 9 in a row ALSO show less variation then there is a possibility of a process improvement (if you can re-center to the target.).0April 17, 2008 at 4:46 pm #171280
Heebeegeebee BBParticipant@Heebeegeebee-BBInclude @Heebeegeebee-BB in your post and this person will
be notified via email.all it indicates is a fundamental shift of your process. It’s a flag that something changed. It’s your cue to investigate.
0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.