Moderator Bias
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Moderator Bias
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
Reigle Stewart.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2004 at 12:52 am #36021
Reigle StewartParticipant@Reigle-StewartInclude @Reigle-Stewart in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Moderator: Purely representing myself and my own opinions, it is most Iteresting that you closed the thread about Green Belt training at ASU (even though a poster asked specifically about it), but iSixSigma has left other such discussion threads open. For example, http://https://www.isixsigma.com/forum/showmessage.asp?messageID=36634. Could this be a form of commercialized predujice given your nonpromotional policy? By the way, there is also a policy on respect for others (why is it not enforced with zest and equality). In relation to the referenced thread, it is also interesting that BMG advertises on your site. Is this a coincidence? What is the PROCESS for closing a thread? Could you please enlighten us? By the way, does Stan have some form of relationship with iSixSigma given his on-going disrespect and harmful comments about others? Respectfully, Reigle Stewart
0June 30, 2004 at 11:45 am #102676Reigle,
I have to admit the thread turned out to be a really a bad one. I don’t know if the original poster’s intention was good or not BUT when I read the follow up posts, it sounded to me more of advertisements for the instructor and the university than anything else. It looked really unprofessional.
We all know how you feel about your boss. You don’t need to bring it on every time. I know a couple of the key folks in that place and in my opinion their SS knowledge and its implementation is very shaky at best. There is no doubt in my mind! So then what? Should I have posted my opinion of them to make the debate unbiased? Then what? Turn this forum to a day time TV talk show?
The subject should have said, “Reigle Bias”. Let it go, man!!!!0June 30, 2004 at 1:01 pm #102681Stan has no relationship with iSixSigma or anyone who posts or advertises on this forum. I have stated by relationships and purposes for posting on this forum many times and have not mislead anyone with what I stated.
0June 30, 2004 at 1:56 pm #102686Don’t talk about professionlism Reigle. How many different names have you posted under? You can deny it all you want. All iSixSigma would have to do is list all of the names you’ve posted under the same IP address. That in itself is an abuse of the forum. You should be blocked just for that.
0June 30, 2004 at 2:28 pm #102688
Reigle StewartParticipant@Reigle-StewartInclude @Reigle-Stewart in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Mike: You say I do not need to bring up Dr. Harry
everytime I post. Interesting you point this out to me when
a select few spew out their false statements about him
(i.e., Stan) in an obvious attempt to discredit and defame
his work (every chance they get). Why dont you provide
commentary on this each time they do this and point out
their being unprofessional? Bias perhaps? Second, you
indicate that you know a couple of people at that place
[ASU] that their implementation knowledge is shaky at
best. This too is interesting since it is only Dr. Harry that is
providing the instruction, not ASU. So, based on your
comment, what does ASU have to do with the course
content? Dr. Harrys business partner Mr. Phong Vu, was
the senior champion at Ford Motor company (reporting to
the CEO). Seems these two gentlemen likely know more
about Six Sigma and its deployment than most. Perhaps
your bias is showing through. In terms of the debate, ASU
has taken a neutral position, but we all know Stan will not
show up. You speak of this forum being turned into a
daytime talk show wake up man and read some of the
site cronies posts it already is a daytime (and night
time) talk show (and tabloid). False, misleading
information abounds and goes unchecked. Disrespect to
others is always on the menu and being served. Of
course, it is pointed out that this is a discussion forum and
not a expert Q&A site many have said let the buyer
beware when it comes to obtaining information on this
site. In many cases, the inflammatory posts are little more
than bathroom graffiti. Unfortunately, the respect policy
of this site has little meaning and is not enforced. While
the vast majority of posters are well intentioned, a few use
the discussion forum to vent their alter egos using lies
and deceit to further their own agendas. Like Stan, when
called out into the open, they fail to appear. Biased?
Maybe so.0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.