multiple regression question
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › multiple regression question
- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
Craig.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2008 at 10:11 pm #51129
Hi,
I’m in the social sciences (psych) using cross sectional data. I’m completing a multiple hierarchical regression looking at interaction effects.
If one of my predictor (non-moderator) variables that I’m using in the interaction is highly non-normal (skewness = 2.1 and kurtosis 4.7), should I transform it to improve it? When is it ok to leave it alone? In terms of the other predictors I’m using, these pass the normality test and I’m centering them to minimize collinearity problems.
Help!
thanks ….0October 16, 2008 at 7:26 am #176762Gabrielle,
Y=F(x1,x2,x3,..)+error where the Xi are your predictors. The error for a certain combination of the Xi is called the Residual at that location. It is not necessary for the regression that the Xi’s are Normal distributed! It is only necessary that the Residuals are normal distributed .
Remi0October 16, 2008 at 9:52 am #176764Think about this example with simple linear regression. You are studying the relationship of adult males height (X) and how that variable is related to weight (Y). You study a range of X between 5 feet tall and 7 feet tall, and choose 5 ft, 5.5 ft, 6 ft, 6.5 ft, and 7 ft as the “settings” for X. You want to do lack of fit, so you randomly choose 5 men at each of the heights. Can you visualize these 25 height values as being normal or a uniform dist? It is only the residuals that have to be normal, not the Y or X values.
0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.