SATURDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2018
Font Size
Topic Performing Gage R&R on Automated Thickness Measuring Machine

Performing Gage R&R on Automated Thickness Measuring Machine

Home Forums General Forums Methodology Performing Gage R&R on Automated Thickness Measuring Machine

This topic contains 5 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  Chuck White 2 weeks, 1 day ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #707148 Reply

    Hello all,

    I have a machine that is used to measure the thickness of flat pieces across the width and length. There are 5 thickness gages across the width (set up by an operator for the different widths of parts), and the system automatically collects a thickness data point, for each gage, every 6 inches down the length of the part.

    We want to look at the accuracy and repeatability of this system.

    My question is, should I perform a Gage R&R for each thickness sensor? Also, since I need a single data point to compare against, should I use an average of the collected data points, or should I use a common data point from piece-to-piece (e.g. 12 inches from the first edge for every part).

    Thanks,
    Joe

    #707151 Reply

    Yes, since it sounds like the measurement is measuring up to 5 items across the width–do gage R&R across all separately.

    #707152 Reply

    @cseider Just a thought. If I do them all at the same time and the gage is acceptable I shouldn’t need to do it separately? It might not be a perfect answer but it would be faster and less work.

    If I have 5 gage readings every 6 inches I can see an opportunity for some simple hypothesis testing as well.

    #707153 Reply

    Oh, I just meant to do the analysis of each separately–of course, I’d “gather” and do the physical gathering, etc at once. Glad you clarified to Joe K.

    #707156 Reply

    Thanks, guys!

    Follow-up question: If I wanted to do a gage R&R for each sensor, how should I compare part-to-part? Should I average the thickness data points from the sensor and use that to compare between parts (for part variability)?

    #707160 Reply

    I recommend choosing a common data point along the length. If you use an average, your study will underestimate the part to part variation, since the variance of sample averages is always less than the variance of individual measurements.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Register Now

  • Stop this in-your-face notice
  • Reserve your username
  • Follow people you like, learn from
  • Extend your profile
  • Gain reputation for your contributions
  • No annoying captchas across site
And much more! C'mon, register now.

Reply To: Performing Gage R&R on Automated Thickness Measuring Machine
Your information:






5S and Lean eBooks

Six Sigma Online Certification: White, Yellow, Green and Black Belt

Six Sigma Statistical and Graphical Analysis with SigmaXL
Six Sigma Online Certification: White, Yellow, Green and Black Belt
Lean and Six Sigma Project Examples
GAGEpack for Quality Assurance
Find the Perfect Six Sigma Job

Login Form