Please explain?
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Please explain?
- This topic has 14 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
fake accrington alert.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 19, 2007 at 10:21 pm #48456
fake accrington alertParticipant@fake-accrington-alertInclude @fake-accrington-alert in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Why companies like Ford,BMW,Jaguar,Rover,etc have all failed with SS? Is it due to wrong implemetation and lack of commitment or due to the concept itself? please elaborate with rational answers and examples .
thanks and regards0October 19, 2007 at 10:25 pm #163403
BrandonParticipant@BrandonInclude @Brandon in your post and this person will
be notified via email.“rational answers and explanations” – ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha………
Good luck.0October 20, 2007 at 1:03 pm #163407The deployment leader at Ford is not leading the consult at ATT wired.
Same result0October 20, 2007 at 9:55 pm #163414BMW is using Lean Six Sigma, they are new to the deployment (2 years) and have been very successful to-date. Why would you be calling them and these other groups a failure?
0October 21, 2007 at 10:35 pm #163440
Ken FeldmanParticipant@DarthInclude @Darth in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Nonsense, BWM changed direction more times than Stan changes his underwear…which is often.
0October 21, 2007 at 10:39 pm #163441The only directional changes you saw were the ones they used to get away from you and the firm you work for?
0October 22, 2007 at 1:34 am #163447
fake accrington alertParticipant@fake-accrington-alertInclude @fake-accrington-alert in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Nonsense
Please talk with facts and evidences0October 22, 2007 at 12:29 pm #163462I have facts Darth / Fake Accrington Alert, try using them yourself when you drop in with your opinions
0October 22, 2007 at 12:44 pm #163463
Ken FeldmanParticipant@DarthInclude @Darth in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Person leading effort leaves due to inaction and waffling of company…fact or not? Was interesting that her name was that of a competitor.
0October 22, 2007 at 12:53 pm #163465She was not ready for the challenge, lacked the change agent skills, while the program is still in place with new champion to lead.
0October 22, 2007 at 1:11 pm #163467
Fake DarthParticipant@Fake-DarthInclude @Fake-Darth in your post and this person will
be notified via email.HOV,I have never seen a fact in anything you’ve posted. If you have
knowledge of something good at BMW, tell us what it is. I suspect it is
unlikely a German run automotive company embraces Six Sigma.0October 22, 2007 at 1:29 pm #1634691. BMW is practicing Lean Six Sigma (they are new to it and have lots to learn but are at least practicing!)
2. They are executing projects – (they ensure projects are strategically aligned, having tollgates, and linking to $ results) – projects are taking a long time and they are still learning but this is no different than any other companies learning process.
3. The resources trained are strong and believe in the projects they are doing. BMW has been a silo business for a long time and won’t be easy to change but they are using data to make decisions now more than ever.
4. They are open to new ideas – BMW has brought in consultants to instill fresh ideas as well as add new skills until they develop their own. It may not be as big a program as it really needs to sustain but it is growing at a reasonable pace.
5. They are changing – they have new policies in place, they are becoming more organized, updating systems and structures, mapping processes, training resources, etc… There is goodness in all of this
Darth/Fake,
Now what facts can you contribute that would dispute any of these positive steps BMW has made?0October 22, 2007 at 2:08 pm #163474Who are the consultants working with BMW?
0October 22, 2007 at 2:11 pm #163475This might help – from the 2008 Lean Six Sigma Summit Conference Agenda:
Select According To Your Organizations Strategy To Ensure Support For Your Program Develops
Not every project and priority must be addressed through a DMAIC project. BMW Manufacturing has developed a three pronged approach to continuous improvement to take advantage of the best approach to each opportunity. The Performance Improvement Program (PIP) process allows every associate at BMW to have a piece of the continuous improvement potential at BMW. The Continuous Improvement Program (CIP) process allows cross-functional teams to address both production and transactional process issues through facilitated workshops. Both the PIP and CIP system have built in processes to assure velocity of improvement and tracking of improvements. The final approach is DMAIC projects addressing more complex, multivariable opportunities. Mark will explain how these three interrelate leading to a high standard of project selection at BMW Manufacturing.Examining how BMWs PIP and CIP processes work
Prioritizing and pulling DMAIC projects
Examining the holistic view of continuous improvement at BMW
Mark FendleyLean Six Sigma and Continuous Improvement ManagerBMW Manufacturing$17,000,000 made from projects suggested by employee workforce
Over 9,000 CIP improvements made
Over $25,000,000 in DMAIC project impact0October 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm #163477
fake accrington alertParticipant@fake-accrington-alertInclude @fake-accrington-alert in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Agree
Remember that we are both “fake”0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.