Process Improvement Department Names
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › General › Process Improvement Department Names
- This topic has 16 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
drquality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 10, 2007 at 6:37 pm #48075
Vinnie BrigandiMember@Vinnie-BrigandiInclude @Vinnie-Brigandi in your post and this person will
be notified via email.We are in the process of restructuring our process improvement function in our organization and we are looking to come up with a creative name for our department. Our department will be mainly responsible for managing and executing process improvement initiatives, using Lean and Six Sigma tools and methodologies. Any input would be appreciated? One we have been thinking about is Operational Excellence.
0September 10, 2007 at 6:46 pm #160971Centre of Excellence
Process Improvement (sounds a bit kiddie)
Process Excellence0September 10, 2007 at 7:06 pm #160972
BrandonParticipant@BrandonInclude @Brandon in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Borrowing from Larry the Cable Guy –
The “Git er Dun” Group0September 10, 2007 at 7:12 pm #160973
Chad TaylorParticipant@Chad-TaylorInclude @Chad-Taylor in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Be careful with the Operational Excellence name, it could get shortened to OpEx which also stands for Operational Expense.
New Solutions Group0September 10, 2007 at 8:06 pm #160974
Steve BohlmanMember@Steve-BohlmanInclude @Steve-Bohlman in your post and this person will
be notified via email.I was faced with that a few years ago when I was hired to implement a Lean Six Sigma program at my company. We chose Performance Improvement, hence I am the Director-Performance Improvement. I tried to keep it as short as we could. Hope it helps.
0September 10, 2007 at 8:20 pm #160975Why not call it what it is?
Quality Assurance0September 11, 2007 at 2:09 am #160978
Steven BonacorsiMember@Steven-BonacorsiInclude @Steven-Bonacorsi in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Hi Vinnie,
While I was working with the US Navy on the deployment of their Lean Six Sigma initiative they too struggled with the same question. They too an interesting approach, they selected an action phrase similar to the fancy names they assign to wartime programs. The Navy business was NAVAIR which stands for the Navy Aviation. The deployment team understood that the #1 reason the Lean Six Sigma group was forming was so they could help accelerate the their readiness by having the right number of planes in the right place and ready to defend the country from its enemies. So they picked AirSpeed.
Perhaps you can hold a similar contest with your team – and pick that action word that will truly represent the reason you exist.
While operational excellence works – I’m sure you and your team can come up with something a little more creative and sexy!
Best wishes,
Steven Bonacorsi
Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt0September 11, 2007 at 2:28 am #160980
Nguyen BaParticipant@championsmanInclude @championsman in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Just Innovation is my idea.
good luck!0September 11, 2007 at 11:33 am #160985In the spirit of Truth in Advertisement .
How do you summarize?
Well come into your department, disrupt your employees, tell you something you already know but are to busy to do anything about it, charge you an arm and a leg and be gone before any failure blame can occur
Stevo
Ps. I feel its going to be a dark day for Stevo.0September 11, 2007 at 12:22 pm #160987How about something a little more catchy?
Process improvement department names:
PIMPS: Personnel Initiating Many Practical Studies
DART: Department Allowing Rational Thinking
SMART: Statistical Methods And Rational Thinking
PUSS: Professionals Utilizing Sigma Solutions
….well, maybe not….:-)0September 11, 2007 at 5:17 pm #161000
drqualityParticipant@drqualityInclude @drquality in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Vinnie,
My advice would be to NOT start or name a new department. Process Improvement is everyone in the company’s resposibility, not a department. As soon as you make a department it will be become a them vs. us type situation. The “marketing” departments faced the same issue 50 years ago and some still do today.
Don’t misunderstand me. You do need to place PI experts throuout your company, but not a department. A top executive (e.g., VP manufacturing, CMO or CEO) should monitor and control their efforts in making good numbers go up and bad numbers go down, but not a department. And those people should be resposible for choosing the numbers and be responsible for making sure that happens using their PI resources.
Good Luck,
Dr. Scott0September 11, 2007 at 5:36 pm #161002DrQuality makes a good point. It’s a tough call as to whether you have something like an OpEx department. (In my humble opinion). The cynical side of me would propose an acronym for the new department name. (NILFLO)
Any guesses?
HACL
0September 11, 2007 at 6:02 pm #161005
Millie TentParticipant@Millie-TentInclude @Millie-Tent in your post and this person will
be notified via email.If you make it a “department”, “initiative”, or “team”, then call it what it is: “OVERHEAD”; because you will be the first thing to go when corporate tells your site to make cuts.
0September 12, 2007 at 10:31 pm #161054
Steven BonacorsiMember@Steven-BonacorsiInclude @Steven-Bonacorsi in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Exellent Points Dr. Scott!
Steven Bonacorsi0September 13, 2007 at 3:29 am #161059NILFLO
0September 13, 2007 at 5:22 am #161062
drqualityParticipant@drqualityInclude @drquality in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Steven,
Good to see a familiar name here again. But NAVAIR is a process or an organization. NAVAIR should not, and to my knowledge since working with them, have not created a department for process improvement. It was hard enough just to get them to dedeicate themselves to wanting to improve. They did have an individual in charge of the effort, but it was not a “department”. Hope you are having better luck with them than I did.
Dr. Scott0September 13, 2007 at 5:31 am #161063
drqualityParticipant@drqualityInclude @drquality in your post and this person will
be notified via email.Stevo,
There is always a right and wrong way of doing things. Unfortunately for you and others, you seem to have too much experience with the wrong way. Let me know if I can enlighten you about the right way to make good numbers go up and bad numbers go down.
Dr. Scott
0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.