Process or Output Indicator?
Six Sigma – iSixSigma › Forums › Old Forums › Europe › Process or Output Indicator?
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
ATI.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 23, 2008 at 3:13 pm #24030
Hello all. I have just started the define stage looking at a process which flows like this: 1) Data received from internal and external sources2) Data manipulated internally3) Data sent to external company for further calculation4) Data received back in-house. Either incorrect- go to stage 3 (rework) or correct- go to stage 55) Distribute to departments for use Project Y is cycle time. My question is, is % correct data at stage 4 a process or an output indicator? To my mind, it looks to be AN output (in that it will supposedly be driven by a combination of inputs and processes preceding it) but not THE output (the project Y- cycle time [however it will presumably drive this, and it could therefore be looked upon as a process indicator]. All thoughts and comments appreciated. Thanks, Paul
0May 16, 2008 at 9:03 am #57563Go ahead
You are the SME0 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Europe’ is closed to new topics and replies.