Sigma value to use in RSS stack for supplier using 100% inspection

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 4 months ago by Strayer.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
July 1, 2021 at 10:44 am #254641

rwq3rd
Participant

@rwq3rd Include @rwq3rd in your post and this person will
be notified via email.

Our group does RSS variation stacks to simulate gaps and flush conditions we may see during assembly. We usually use a Cpk of 1.33 for our suppliers. Sometimes we’ll have a supplier that cannot meet the 1.33 and will do 100% inspection to ensure good parts.
My question is what should we now use in the RSS stack for Cpk to predict what we will see in the final product?

0

July 7, 2021 at 8:31 pm #254674

Strayer
★ 10 Years ★
Participant

@Straydog Include @Straydog in your post and this person will
be notified via email.

Can you assume that a supplier that performs 100% inspections delivers zero defectives? Of course not. My inclination is that they should not be treated differently from any other supplier. But I’m wondering why you asked this question.

0
Author

Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.