iSixSigma

Six sigma

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #42811

    Aman
    Participant

    why we talk about six sigma why not 3 sigma, why not 7 sigma?
     

    0
    #135333

    Zero_Cool
    Member

    Aman,
    If you could notice this is “ISixSigma Forum” not “ISevenSigma” nor “IThreeSigma”.  Well, anyway, we have touch this topic quite long time and your are quite a bit too late. Very very late. If you just excert an extra effort to seach this site, you will find how many discussion we have made in the past. Anyway, your late.
    Zero_Cool 

    0
    #135336

    Aman
    Participant

    Dear,
    I think I have been misunderstood, what I meant to say was that …I wanna know the statisticl explaination of six sigma theory.
    I know that would a very naive question but since I’m a biggner & I have to start somewhere. so please guys don’t mind.

    0
    #135338

    Maurizio
    Participant

    I see, the explaination is just that it is based on the variation from the the mean when you have a normal  (or chi, I never remember, should study more) distribution
    I hope it helps at least to comprehend
    Ciao 

    0
    #135365

    Aman
    Participant

    Yes, I got the hint, but is there anyone who can elobrate it to us ( i mean me & other people like me).
    But thanks alot for Maurizio

    0
    #135390

    Zero_Cool
    Member

    Aman,
    A good question will deserve a good answer. Then:
    As a layman’s shortcut explanation, Six Sigma is not totaly came from a statistical analysis though it uses statistic on the calculation of DPMO / PPM under the area of a normal distribution, the effect of 1.5 sigma shift is applied. The sigma shift is an empirical data from previous studies of those people pioneering SS methodology, from which they claim that it is from observed process long term variation of 1.4 to .16 sigma shift. Until now, with long discussion, this shift and the data of calculating the 1.4 to 1.6 sigma is not avialable. Thus, these shift are now merely an assumption that your process will shift as much as 1.6 sigma.
    Fortunately, the methodology works fine, but the 1.5 sigma shift is ???? up to you to utilized.  
    Try to search this site for more information.
    Zero_Cool         

    0
    #135408

    Maurizio
    Participant

    pardon my confusion, but when to talk about elaborating, what do you mean? do you want a formula that can calculate the sigma level and analyse it to see how it works. but I can tell you alsow that the sigma scale is not direct but it is logarithmic.
    let me know what exactly you need and I will see to it that you have the answer, to the best of my abilities :)
    Maurizio

    0
    #135409

    Vipin Kaushik
    Member

     
    Refer to my answer below the table. Table is put in to give you idea about the relationship between yield & the sigma level.

    Six Sigma Conversion Table

    Yield%
    DPMO
    Sigma

    6.68%
    933200
    0

    8.455%
    915450
    0.125

    10.56%
    894400
    0.25

    13.03%
    869700
    0.375

    15.87%
    841300
    0.5

    19.08%
    809200
    0.625

    22.66%
    773400
    0.75

    26.59.5%
    734050
    0.875

    30.85%
    691500
    1

    35.435%
    645650
    1.125

    40.13%
    598700
    1.25

    45.025%
    549750
    1.375

    50%
    500000
    1.5

    54.975%
    450250
    1.625

    59.87%
    401300
    1.75

    64.565%
    354350
    1.875

    69.15%
    308500
    2

    73.405%
    265950
    2.125

    77.34%
    226600
    2.25

    80.92%
    190800
    2.375

    84.13%
    158700
    2.5

    86.97%
    130300
    2.625

    89.44%
    105600
    2.75

    91.545%
    84550
    2.875

    93.32%
    66800
    3

    94.79%
    52100
    3.125

    95.99%
    40100
    3.25

    96.96%
    30400
    3.375

    97.73%
    22700
    3.5

    98.32%
    16800
    3.625

    98.78%
    12200
    3.75

    99.12%
    8800
    3.875

    99.38%
    6200
    4

    99.565%
    4350
    4.125

    99.7%
    3000
    4.25

    99.795%
    2050
    4.375

    99.87%
    1300
    4.5

    99.91%
    900
    4.625

    99.94%
    600
    4.75

    99.96%
    400
    4.875

    99.977%
    230
    5

    99.982%
    180
    5.125

    99.987%
    130
    5.25

    99.992%
    80
    5.375

    99.997%
    30
    5.5

    99.998%
    23.35
    5.625

    99.998%
    16.7
    5.75

    99.999%
    10.05
    5.875

    99.99966%
    3.4
    6
     Yield above this level would be very low even you put in lots of resource in it. I guess that’s why we talk about six sigma. Not more than six. Three we do not take as the yield would be very  low.
    Hope I am there.
    Regards,
    Vipin

    0
    #135497

    Aman
    Participant

    Thanks alot Mazio,
    I appriciate your good gestures.
    I asked the reason why six sigma hy not some other value sigma? but I couldn’t get the right answer so far.
    I need to know the theory behind this, also obviously as you go ( i mean you increase sigma) your decreasing the defects or non confomities. but why we stuck at SS level? why not some other value of sigma?
     
     

    0
    #135510

    Adrian P. Smith
    Participant

    Hi Aman
    “Six Sigma” is the name of a quality improvement methodology.
    It in no way implies that 6 Sigma is the target performance for every process, or indeed that 6 Sigma is good enough in every case.
    Obviously some processes must be far higher than Six Sigma and for some, 3 or 4 sigma (or even 1 or 2 Sigma) may be good enough.
    It is a balance between customer demands, business priorities, what  the competition are doing and the ROI of any improvement solution.
    There are many discussions about why Six Sigma was chosen as the name, the most likely being (IMHO) the fact that it alliterates and therefore makes for good marketing (think Coca-Cola, Chupa Chips, Pet Palace and Freddy’s Fresh Fried Fish Factory). It is of course also a mark of high quality (3.4 defects per million) but achievable quality (7 Sigma is more like 2 defects in a billion).

    0
    #135560

    Maurizio Garzelli
    Participant

    indeed, I agree.
    I was looking around in the internet and I found out for example, that a nice place with a good explaination for 6 sigma is wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma it has a nice article on 6 sigma.
    the alliterative origin of it might be purely casual but it is quite nice ;)
    Maurizio Garzelli

    0
    #135561

    kaiser_soze
    Participant
    #135562

    TwoCents
    Member

    I agree with Adrian…I think the truth of the matter is that “Six Sigma” was selected because it’s catchy.
    Whether you are 1.5 shift believer or not, I find it particularly interesting that the 1.5 z-shift conveniently closes the gap between the “catchy” Six Sigma (which is mathematically 2 parts/billion) and the more reasonably attainable 3.4 DPMO.
    After all, would you spend a bunch of money on a program called “Four-point-Five Sigma”?

    0
    #135570

    Maurizio Garzelli
    Participant

    …not very 6 sigma oriented.

    0
    #135595

    Aman
    Participant

    Hi Maurizio GarzelliThanks alot for you & the others for their insight into that matter.
    let me see the link that you have farwarded to us.
     

    0
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.