Six Sigma Training expense and License

From what I’m told, Motorola does own the rights to Six Sigma but has made the term and the methodology available for everyone to use. I have heard Six Sigma Acamemy is actively pursuing lawsuits against anyone using the terms Breakthrough Strategy, Master Black Belt, Black Belt and Green Belt.
The ISSSP (International Society of Six Sigma Professionals) is putting together a regulatory board on Six Sigma certification criteria. I have also heard ASQ is putting together their own set of Six Sigma standards. (who gives them this authority???)

I believe Dr. Harry and associates are claiming responsibilities for conceiving the terms: Black Belt, Green Belt etc. (Although I have read that there are records of certificates from Motorola using the term Black Blet dating back to 1987 prior to the formation of Six Sigma Academy).
As far as regulatory boards, I’m much more comfortable with ISSSP than ASQ. From what I understand, the ISSSP plans on using current Black Belts (certified by Allied Signal, GE, Motorola, Six Sigma Academy, etc) to design the standards, not TQM gurus or CQE’s that are looking to make a buck on the whole thing. In my mind, one of the purposes should be to maintain the integrity of Six Sigma and to reduce the number of hybrid, self-directed programs now emerging. From my 3 years of experience as Black Belt, projects fail when you start to cut corners.