Which OA Is Best for the Taguchi Method?
- April 24, 2018 at 2:30 am #55985
I have a qustion about Taguchi method. I have 5 factors each in 2 level and also 2 interactions. By calulating DF it seems that L8(2*5) OA is required. But comparing with fractional factorial design, it seems that L8 design falls into Resolution III area which should be avoided. I am using minitab and it provides two different set of L8 combinations when following Taguchi method and Facrtional Factorial method.
The questions is:
1- Which one I should trust more, Fractional Factorial method suggests L16 and Taguchi method suggests L8 and I have to decide Before proceeding any further.
2- If using L8 OA, do I need to include two interactions and form a L8(2*7) OA or I can just simply use L8(2*5).
Thanks0April 24, 2018 at 8:54 am #202505
Robert ButlerParticipant@rbutler Include @rbutler in your post and this person will
be notified via email.
The Taguchi OA’s are just renamed and cosmetically altered standard designs. Given what you are trying to do it would be much easier to take a fractional design of 5 factors in 8 experiments and add a couple of experiments to make sure the interactions of interest are clear of the 5 main factors.
The principal block for the 5 factor, 8 experiment design is as follows: (1), ad, bc, abcd, abe, bde, ace, cde. This gives you all 5 factors clear of one another but confounded with 2 way interactions which is why you would need to augment this design with a couple of other design points to clear the needed 2 way interactions. Minitab has the capability to run augmentation using D-optimal methods.0
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.