Julius Ianniello March 16, 20010
Home › Forums › Old Forums › General › Metrics
This topic has 1 voice, contains 3 replies, and was last updated by
Julian Sea 4081 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| March 16, 2001 at 5:00 am #16965 | |
| Julius Ianniello @Julius-Ianniello Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum | could anyone advise whether there is an advantage to establish baseline metrics utilizing PPM vs DPMO. All of the 6 Sigma training I’ve read consistently refers to DPMO. For all intents and purposes, isn’t it 6 of-one and a half-dozen of the other?? thank you – jules Ianniello |
| March 17, 2001 at 5:00 am #16972 | |
| Joe Perito @Joe-Perito Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum | PPM defects will not allow you to identify your problems nor tell if you are improving or getting worse in any particular area of the plant… especially when you are trying to see the efficiency of the company department by department, or as a whole. Yes, you can tell if your TV production had 30 PPM defective tuners. But next week the tuners may be OK and the horizontal controls may have 30 PPM. 30 is 30. Your data for the company as a whole may look like nothing changed. DPMO is the square root of the sum of all the different defect types (each) squared. Thus, any change in the defect types or quantities anywhere in the factory will show up in the reported numbers. All are standardized to a sigma level. Therefore, 2 defects with only one type of oportunity for failure in on department can be compared on the same performance scale as the 30 types of defects that can have interdependant failure modes resulting in combinations and permutations that could have hundreds, thousands, or millions of DPMO in a single computer chip design. Thus, it’s like sending up flares throughout the factory every time a quality level shifts by quantity or by location. |
| March 20, 2001 at 5:00 am #17004 | |
| Ken Myers @Ken-Myers Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum | Julius, Look let’s try to keep this stuff simple. If you are Ken |
| March 20, 2001 at 5:00 am #17008 | |
| Julian Sea @JULES Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum | Joe/Ken - Thanks for your replies. Based upon my findings and your responses, I believe DPMO is the best way to communicate our baseline metrics. Thanks – Jules |
The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.
© Copyright iSixSigma 2000-2012. User Agreement. Any reproduction or other use of content without the express written consent of iSixSigma is prohibited. More »