Kevin Hankins
was active Not recently activeActivity
-
Kevin Hankins replied to the topic range vs. standard deviation in the forum General 20 years, 3 months ago
1. Go to http://www.aecouncil.com/data_analysis to get DE Histograms (free).
2. Click on “Give me some data in Excel”.
3. Select some cells, and then click on “Normal Random Numbers Fill”.
4. Find the range of your Sample from Step 3 (you can use Max()-Min()).
5. Find the stdev() of the same Sample.
6. Repeat.
7. You will find that Rbar…[Read more] -
Kevin Hankins replied to the topic Master Black Belt in the forum General 20 years, 3 months ago
MBBs must have advanced applied statistical education or the equivalent. An MBA would rarely satisfy this requirement. There are several university statistics departments that could serve up the minimum “3 Graduate level Applied Statistics classes with a B or better” that I suggest.
Of course, this answers the “What do most companies look f…[Read more] -
Kevin Hankins replied to the topic Stork Example in the forum General 20 years, 3 months ago
Correlation and regression are rich areas which need much applied R&D before they can be broadly and commonly applied in SS programs.
For instance, I have seen none of the available SS materials explain the difference in shape of the prediction intervals between correlation and regression. Or that the univariate spec limits on which SS is based…[Read more] -
Kevin Hankins replied to the topic Must 6Sigma come from Top down? in the forum General 20 years, 3 months ago
The most successful will come from the top-down _and_ the bottom-up. The top should, very early on in the SS program, broadly and deeply solicit any interested stakeholders to participate in an affinitization party from which the SS program can be defined.
To only be top-down, as are many SS programs, is to grossly offend your most experienced,…[Read more] -
Kevin Hankins replied to the topic Process Sigma Calculation in the forum General 20 years, 3 months ago
The Six Sigma philosophy is to _understate_ your process by the 1.5 sigma shift. You always shift the 1.5 toward the Customer Spec Limit.
Therefore, the Calculator is wrong. It overstates the answer by 3.0 sigma, because the 1.5 should be -1.5, not +1.5.
Kevin Hankins
[email protected]