Marz

can you send me a copy to [email protected]

Thank you everyone for the responses.  Trust me, when I come on to a message board and ask questions I am not trying to appear as “childish”.  I obviously do not know the answer to my question and am deferring to you, the experts, for advice/guidance.  I have no problem with Stan, I only argued that he wasn’t even attempting to answer my qu…[Read more]

Stan,
As much as appreciate the insight, you are not helping at all.  What is the point of coming on to a discussion board and being rude/not helping people and just posting dumb responses.  Why do you care why I need this information?  For my business and my products it is necessary.  Period.  If you don’t have anything helpful to say, say noth…[Read more]

Thank you for the insight.  I am familiar with how Cp and Cpks are calculated.  I have seen elsewhere where they say to just use the lowest Cpk of the products since that is indicative of the overall process regardless of whether or not other products have a higher Cpk.  I will continue to do some digging on this but thank you.

Ok not the constructive answer I was looking for but if I have to validate dumb responses I will.
Basically, if each week you would have product A’s Cpk, product B’s Cpk, and product C’s cpk all for the same quality aspect and all products are produced on identical production lines and measured in the same lab, I would want to simplify this and…[Read more]

Try the steps outlined in this link. . .http://www.dicks-blog.com/archives/2004/05/11/conditional-data-validation/

Mario,
Can you explain this chart for me please?  Especially the Y-axis relation to Cpk…  Thank you.

Apparently your are uneducated on the subject yourself.  Or is it you need the ex-lax?

For your reference, here’s the definition of “prevention costs” listed in the dictionary available on this website:
Prevention Cost:Money required to prevent defectsMoney spent in establishing methods & proceduresMoney spent in trainingMoney spent in planning qualitySpent before the product is actually built
kwc

Based on the definition available on this website, “prevention” is not included in COPQ.

Could I please get a copy?
 
[email protected]

Hi Pete:
p value received is 0.000. Test result is given below.
Two-Sample T-Test and CI: AHT-Sherwin Team (Pilot Phase), AHT-Process (Pilot Phase)
 
Two-sample T for AHT-Sherwin Team (Pilot Phase) vs AHT-Process (Pilot Phase)
 
                           N   Mean  StDev  SE Mean
AHT-Sherwin Team (Pilot   16  17.84   1.08     0.27
AHT-Pr…[Read more]

Hi:
Just curious have you made a plan? I have the exact same problem?
 
Kevin

Thanks Scott.
Yes, you are correct in your interpretation of the way I am calculating the weekly data.
I will send you the weekly data for as many weeks possible.
Yes, I can even get the daily data but then the number of evaluations per day would be very less. Also in this case I want to work only on weekly data as I have to compare it with…[Read more]

So it means I cannot use the tools for Continuous data analysis.
Now if similarly I have the CSAT data, it will also be discrete. Right?
So, now if I have to do some relationship analysis, can I not do correlation analysis? What regression analysis tool do I need to use in this case?
Thanks.

Well the weekly data could be like Week1 = 85.65, Week2 = 74.28 and so on so forth. So it means that it can take any vaule within a range. This data cannot be ideally broken into finer logical increments.
So cannot be taken as continuous, it is what you are saying?
Thanks.

You brought up one very good point in your initial post, nested Gage R+R’s assume the samples are identical. Any part to part variation will show up as gage variation in your test. If you have good confidence that your part variaiton is low, you might be able to overlook this requirement.
If you are trying to determine the repeatability of your…[Read more]

If you have Minitab, you should try
Stat > DOE > Analyze Variability
which is designed to analyze variation of a response from repeated measurements. It has a tendancy to need large repeated data sets. DOE > Analyze Variability
which is designed to analyze variation of a response from repeated measurements. It has a tendancy to need large…[Read more]

yes,mine is just a literally meaning.