Design for Six Sigma – IDOV Methodology

Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) can be accomplished using any one of many methodologies. IDOV is one popular methodology for designing products and services to meet six sigma standards.

IDOV is a four-phase process that consists of Identify, Design, Optimize and Verify. These four phases parallel the four phases of the traditional Six Sigma improvement methodology, MAIC – Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. The similarities can be seen below.

Identify Phase

The Identify phase begins the process with a formal tie of design to voice of the customer (VOC). This phase involves developing a team and team charter, gathering VOC, performing competitive analysis, and developing CTQs.

Crucial Steps:

  • Identify customer and product requirements
  • Establish the business case
  • Identify technical requirements (CTQ variables and specification limits)
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Milestones

Key Tools:

Handpicked Content:   Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) Versus DMAIC

Design Phase

The Design phase emphasizes CTQs and consists of identifying functional requirements, developing alternative concepts, evaluating alternatives and selecting a best-fit concept, deploying CTQs and predicting sigma capability.

Crucial Steps:

  • Formulate concept design
  • Identify potential risks using FMEA
  • For each technical requirement, identify design parameters (CTQs) using engineering analysis such as simulation
  • Raw materials and procurement plan
  • Manufacturing plan
  • Use DOE (design of experiments) and other analysis tools to determine CTQs and their influence on the technical requirements (transfer functions)
Handpicked Content:   DFSS Helps Mask a Bitter Taste

Key Tools:

Optimize Phase

The Optimize phase requires use of process capability information and a statistical approach to tolerancing. Developing detailed design elements, predicting performance, and optimizing design, take place within this phase.

Crucial Steps:

  • Assess process capabilities to achieve critical design parameters and meet CTQ limits
  • Optimize design to minimize sensitivity of CTQs to process parameters
  • Design for robust performance and reliability
  • Error proofing
  • Establish statistical tolerancing
  • Optimize sigma and cost
  • Commission and startup

Key Tools:

Validate Phase

The Validate phase consists of testing and validating the design. As increased testing using formal tools occurs, feedback of requirements should be shared with manufacturing and sourcing, and future manufacturing and design improvements should be noted.

Crucial Steps:

  • Prototype test and validation
  • Assess performance, failure modes, reliability and risks
  • Design iteration
  • Final phase review

Key Tools:

  • Accelerated testing
  • Reliability engineering
  • FMEA
  • Disciplined new product introduction (NPI)

Comments 6

  1. Devna

    Good article. Very informative

  2. Neil Woodward

    Excellent article, very concise and a useful revision guide.

  3. Saud

    From expert perspective what are your recommendation on how DFSS can be integrated into NPD ?
    Thank you in advance.

  4. Andrés Carrera

    Goog article, im studing SSGB in the ASQ handbook, and they took this article for the book.

  5. Suzanne

    interesting; would like to see some convergence with Agile

  6. Sergey

    Nice! Are there any examples or case studies relevant?

Leave a Reply